A technical-economic perspective on artificial intelligence role in platform markets organization
Keywords:plateformes, dominant design, Intelligence Artificielle, infrastructures techniques, écosystèmes
Our intention, in this article, is to analyze the process of developing a dominant generative platform design. Our research approach mobilizes several fundamental concepts relating to technical infrastructures as well as to platform ecosystems. The stake of this technico-economic perspective is to enrich the reading grid of the platforms in their dimension of generative infrastructure as well as that of the new market mechanisms that they create. We analyze the place and role of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, in their structuring dimension of technological designs and also of the associated platform markets. We put into perspective three dynamics of platform market structuring and explain, for each of them, the central role of AI.
Abernathy W. J., Utterback J. M., (1978) “Patterns of Industrial Innovation”, Technology Review, vol. 80, June-July 1978, p. 41-47.
Abernathy W. J., Clark K. B., (1985) “Innovation: Mapping the Winds of Creative Destruction”, Research Policy, 1985, 14, p. 3-22.
Adner, R. (2017). “Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy”. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58.
Altman, E. J. (2017). Dependencies, complementor evolution, response strategies: joining a multi-sided platform ecosystem. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2017, No. 1, p. 15484). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
Ardolino, M., Saccani, N., Adrodegari, F., & Perona, M. (2020). A business model framework to characterize digital multisided platforms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(1), 10.
Baldwin, C. Y. and C. J. Woodard (2009), “The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View”, Platforms, Markets and Innovation, 19-44.
Ballon, P., et Van Heesvalde, E. (2011), “ICT platforms and regulatory concerns in Europe”, Telecommunications Policy, 35(8), 702-714.
Basole, R.C. , Russel, M.G. , Huhtamaki, J. , Rubens, N. , Still, K. , and Ppark, H. (2015). “Understanding Business Ecosystem Dynamics: A Data-Driven Approach”, ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS) 6 (2): 6.
Basole, R.C. , Park, H. , Barnett, B.C. (2014). “Coopetition and Convergence in the ICT Ecosystem”, Telecommunications Policy 39: 537–552.
Blaschke , M., Haki, K., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2019), « Taxonomy of Digital Platforms: A Platform Architecture Perspective» 14th International Conference on Wirtschafts informatik.
Bekkers, R., Duysters , G., & Verspagen , B. (2002). “Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure: The case of GSM”. Research Policy, 31, 1141–1162.
Benavent, C. (2016), « Plateformes. Sites collaboratifs, marketplaces, réseaux Sociaux. Comment ils influencent nos choix», FYP editions Limoges.
Boudreau, K. J., & Hagiu, A. (2009), « Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators», Platforms, markets and innovation, 1, 163-191.
Cabanes, B., Le Masson, P., Weil, B., Kokshagina, O., & Cogez, P. (2015, June). Innovation et compétition entre plateformes technologiques: vers une stratégie basée sur la pervasivité des technologies. In XXIVe Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique.
Choudary S.P., (2015), « Platform scale », Platform Thinking Labs, 336 pages.
Ciborra, C.U., Braa, K., Cordella, A., Dahlbom, B., Failla, A., Hanseth, O., & al. (2000), “From Control to Drift. The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures”, New York: Oxford University Press.
Clough, D. R., & Wu, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence, Data-driven learning, and the decentralized structure of platform ecosystems. Academy of Management Review, (ja).
Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., Parker, G.G., (2018), «Introduction-Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age», Information Systems Research, 29(2):381-400.
Cusumano, M. A., & Gawer, A. (2002). “The elements of platform leadership”. MIT Sloan management review, 43(3), 51.
De Reuver, M., Sorensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018), «The digital platform: a research agenda», Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124–135.
Evans, PC & Gawer, A. (2016), “The Rise of the Platform Enterprise: A Global Survey” [Report] The Emerging Platform Economy Series No. 1.
Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne M. 2006. “Strategies for two-sided markets”. Harvard Business Review 84: 92–101.
Fu, W., Wang, Q., & Zhao, X. (2017). “The influence of platform service innovation on value co-creation activities and the network effect”. Journal of Service Management.
Gawer, A. (2014), “Bridging Differing Perspectives on Technological Platforms: Toward an Integrative Framework”, Research Policy 43(7): 1239–1249.
Ghazawneh, A. Henfridsson. O. (2015), “A paradigmatic analysis of digital application marketplaces”, Journal of Information Technology 30.3 (2015): 198-208.
Hagiu, A. and J. Wright (2011). “Multi-Sided Platforms”, Harvard Business School Working Paper 12-024.
Henfridsson, O., and Bygstad, B. (2013), “The Generative Mechanisms of Digital Infrastructure Evolution”, MIS Quarterly 37(3): 907–931.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). “Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms”. Administrative science quarterly, 9-30.
Iansiti, M. , and Levien, R. (2004a). “The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy », Innovation, and Sustainability, Brighton: Harvard Business Press.
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018), “Towards a theory of ecosystems”. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255-2276.
Kazan, E, Tan C-W, Lim ETK, Sørensen C, Damsgaard J. (2018), “Disentangling Digital Platform Competition: The Case of UK Mobile Payment Platforms”, Journal of Management Information Systems. 2018;35(1):180-219.
Katal, A., Wazid, M., & Goudar, R. H. (2013, August). “Big data: issues, challenges, tools and good practices”. In 2013 Sixth international conference on contemporary computing (IC3) (pp. 404-409). IEEE.
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1986). “Technology adoption in the presence of the network externalities”. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 822–841.
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005), “Blue ocean strategy: from theory to practice”, California management review, 47(3), 105-121.
Kiron, D., & Schrage, M. (2019). “Strategy for and with AI”. MIT Sloan Management Review Magazine.
Kapoor, R. (2018). Ecosystems: broadening the locus of value creation. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1), 1-16
Levy, F. (2018). “Computers and populism: artificial intelligence, jobs, and politics in the near term”. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(3), 393-417.
Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). “Service innovation”. MIS quarterly, 39(1), 155-176.
Mucha, T., & Seppala, T. (2020). “Artificial Intelligence Platforms”– A New Research Agenda for Digital Platform Economy.
Miguel, J. C., & Casado, M. Á. (2016). GAFAnomy (Google, Amazon, Facebook and Apple): The big four and the b-ecosystem. In Dynamics of big internet industry groups and future trends (pp. 127-148). Springer, Cham.
Parker, G.G., and Van Alstyne, M.W. (2006), “Two-Sided Network Effects: ATheory of Information Product Design”, Management Science 51(10): 1494–1504.
Parker, G.G., Van Alstyne, M., Choudary, S. P., & Foster, J. (2016), “Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you”, New York: WW Norton (p. 352).
Parker, G.G., Alstyne, M., & Jiang, X. (2017), “Platform Ecosystems: How Developers Invert the Firm” MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 255-A4.
Rai, A., Constantinides, P., & Sarker, S. (2019), “Next-Generation Digital Platforms: Toward Human–AI Hybrids”, MIS Quarterly, 43(1), iii–ix.
Ritala, P., Golnam, A., & Wegmann, A. (2014). Coopetition-based business models: The case of Amazon. com. Industrial marketing management, 43(2), 236-249.
Sorescu, A. (2017), “Data driven business model innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management”, 34(5), 691-696.
Springel, K. (2016), “Network externality and subsidy structure in two-sided markets: Evidence from electric vehicle incentives”, Job Market Paper, 2016.
Soh, C., & Markus, L. (2016). “B2B E-Marketplaces-Interconnection Effects”, Strategic Positioning, and Performance», Systèmes d'Information et Management, 7(1), 3.
Suarez, F. F., & Utterback, J. M. (1995), “Dominant designs and the survival of firms”, Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 415-430.
Swanson, E.B., Ramiller, N.C., (1997),“The organizing vision in information systems innovation”, Organization Science,Vol 8, n°5, pp 458-474.
Teece, D. J. (1986). “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy”. Research policy, 15(6), 285-305.
Teece, D. J. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles. In Entrepreneurship, innovation, and platforms. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Thomas, L., Aautio, E., and Gann, D. (2014), “Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context”, The Academy of Management Perspectives 28(2): 198–219.
Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., and Sorensen, C. (2010), “Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda”, Information Systems Research 21(5): 748–759.
Tiwana, A. (2014), “Platform ecosystems, Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy”, Morgan Kaufmann.
Tiwana, A., & Bush, A. A. (2014). Spotting lemons in platform markets: A conjoint experiment on signaling. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(3), 393-405.
Utterback J. M., (1994). “Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation”, Harvard Business School Press.
Vitari, C., & Raguseo, E. (2016). Digital data, dynamic capability and financial performance: an empirical investigation in the era of Big Data. Systemes d'information management, 21(3), 63-92.
Wulf, J., & Blohm, I. (2020). “Fostering value creation with digital platforms: A unified theory of the application programming interface design”. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(1), 251-281.
Yoo, Y. (2013), “The Table Has Turned: How Can IS Field Contribute to the Technology and Innovation”, Management Journal of the AIS 14: 227–236.
Zhu, F., Li, X., Valavi, E., & Iansiti, M. (2021). Network interconnectivity and entry into platform markets. Information Systems Research (forthcoming) WP 19-062 : 1-43.
The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.
It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:
- ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
- it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.
In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:
- The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
- The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).