Le management amont et aval des droits de propriété intellectuelle au sein des écosystèmes-plateformes naissants


  • Amel Attour GREDEG (UMR 7321)-UNS
  • Cécile Ayerbe




Platform ecosystem, intellectual property rights, open innovation, knowledge creation, NFC platform.


This research underlines the role of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) to manage knowl- edge in the development of complex systems such as platform-ecosystems without an orches- trator actor. These ecosystems are straightaway registered in an inter-organizational inno- vation model around a ‘core’ platform which structures their existences. Thanks to Nice Futur Campus (NFCampus) case study, the paper shows how the upstream and down- stream management of IPR contributes to the emergence of Near Field Communication (NFC) platform-ecosystem. It also proposes several theoretical contributions both on the ris- ing ecosystems and on the open innovation literature. These contributions concern the structuring role of IPR in the birth of an ecosystem, the articulation between tacit and ex- plicit knowledge and the open degree of the technological platform. The paper highlights be- sides practitioners and local public actors on the way IPR may favour or slow down the in- dustrialization of numerous current experimentations in NFC domain, or more generally on how IPR management contributes to the success deployment of innovation emanating from a platform-ecosystem without an orchestrator actor. 


Attour A., Della Peruta M. (2014), “Archi- tectural Knowledge: key flows and pro- cesses in designing an inter-organization- al technological platform”, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, forth- coming.

Attour A., Rallet A. (2014), “ Le rôle des ter- ritoires dans le développement des sys- tèmes trans-sectoriels d’innovation lo- caux : le cas des smart cities”, Innovations, n°43, p. 253-279.

Ayerbe C., Missonier A. (2007), Validité in- terne et validité externe de l’étude de cas : principes et mise en œuvre pour un renforcement mutuel », Finance Contrôle Stratégie, vol. 10, n°2, p. 37-62.

Ayerbe C., Azzam J. (2015), “Pratiques co- opétitives dans l’Open Innovation : les enseignements des patents pools”, Ma- nagement International, vol. 19, n°2, p. 95-114.

Baldwin C., Clark K. (2000), The power of modularity, MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.

Baldwin C., Woodward J. (2009), “The ar- chitecture of platforms: a unified view”, in Platforms, Markets and Innovation, A. Gawer (ed.), Edward Elgar, London, UK, p.19-44.

Basole R.C., Rouse W.B. (2008), “Complex- ity of service value networks: conceptu- alization and empirical investigation”, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 47, n°1, p. 53- 70.

Basole R.C., (2009), “Visualization of inter- firm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem”, Journal of Information Technology, vol. 24, n°2, p. 144-159.

Benbya H., Meissonier R. (2007), “La contribution des Systèmes de Gestion des Connaissances au développement de nouveaux produits : étude de cas d’une entreprise du secteur de l’industrie aéro- nautique”, Systèmes d’Information et Ma- nagement, vol. 12, n°1, p. 75-95.

Bennett R.H., Anthony W.P. (2001), “ Un- derstanding the role of intuition-tacit knowledge and analysis-explicit knowl- edge in bank deliberations”, in: T.H. Lant et Z. Shapira (eds.), Organizational Cog- nition: Computation and interpretation, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, p.185-209.

Boudreau K. (2010), “Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Ac- cess vs. Devolving Control”, Manage- ment Science, vol. 56, n°10, p. 1849- 1872.

Boudreau K., Lakhani K. (2009), “How to Manage Outside Innovation: Competitive Markets or Collaborative Communities?”,


MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 50, n°4, p. 69-75.

Chanal V., Lesca H., Martinet A.C. (1997), “Vers une ingénierie de la recherche en sciences de gestion”, Revue Française de Gestion, n°116, p. 41-51.

Chesbrough H. (2003), Open Innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business School Press.

Chesbrough H. (2006), Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Inno- vation Landscape, Boston: Harvard Busi- ness School Press.

Chesbrough H., Bogers M. (2014), “Expli- cating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding in- novation”, in: Chesbrough, H., Vanhaver- beke,W., West, J. (Eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford University Press,Oxford.

Cohendet P., Pénin J. (2011), “Patents to exclude versus include : Rethinking the management of intellectual property rights in a knowledge-based economy”, Technology Innovation Management Re- view, December, p. 12-17.

Cohen M.D., Bacdayan P. (1994), “Organi- zational routines are stored as procedu- ral memory: evidence from a laboratory study”, Organization Science, vol. 5, n°4, p. 554-568.

Dahlander L., Gann D.M. (2010), “How open is innovation?”, Research Policy, vol. 39, p. 699–709.

David A. (2000), “Logique, épistémologie et méthodologie en sciences de gestion : trois hypothèses revisitées”, in Les nou- velles fondations des sciences de gestion – Eléments d’épistémologie de la re- cherche en management, A. David, A. Hatchuel, R. Laufer (eds.), Vuibert, Paris, p. 83-110.

De Vogeleer E., Lescop D. (2011), “Plate- formes, coordination et incitations”, Ma- nagement & Avenir, n°46, p. 200-218.

Edouard S., Gratacap A. (2011), “ Proposi- tion d’un modèle d’intelligence collective pour les écosystèmes d’affaires ”, Mana- gement & Avenir, vol. 6, n°46, p.177-199.

Egelhoff W.G. (1982), “Strategy and struc- ture in multinational corporations – an information processing approach”, Ad- ministrative Science Quarterly, vol. 27, n°3, pp. 435-458.

Eisenhardt K.M. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 14, n°4, p. 532-550.

Eisenhardt K.M., Graebener M.E. (2007), “Theory building from cases: opportuni- ties and challenges”, Academy of Man- agement Journal, vol. 50, n°1, p.25-32.

Enkel E., Gassmann O., Chesbrough H. (2009), “Open R&D and open innova- tion: exploring the phenomenon”, R&D Management, vol. 39, n°4, p. 311–316.

Gassmann O., Bader M.A. (2006), “Intellec- tual Property Management in Inter-firm R&D Collaborations ”, Taiwan Academy of Management Journal, vol. 6, n°2, p. 217-236.

Gassmann O., Enkel E. (2004), “Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes”, Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, July 6-9.

Gawer A. (2009), “Platforms dynamics and strategies: From products to services”, in Platforms, Markets and Innovation, A. Gawer (ed.), p. 45-76.

Gawer A. (2010), “Towards a general theo- ry of technological platforms”, DUID Summer Conference 2010, London, 16- 18 june, 40 pages.

Gawer A., Cusumano M.A. (2002), “Plat- form leadership : How Intel, Microsoft


and Cisco drived industry innovation”, Harvard Business School Press.

Gawer A., Cusumano M.A. (2010a), “How firms become platform leaders ”, MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 49, n°2, p. 28-35.

Gawer A., Cusumano M.A. (2010b), “The organization of technological platforms”, Research in the Sociology of Organiza- tions, vol. 29, p. 287-296.

Gawer A., Cusumano M.A. (2012), “Indus- try platforms and ecosystem innovation”, DRUID 2012. CBS, Copenhagen, Den- mark.

Geertz C. (1973), “Thick Description: To- ward an Interpretative Theory of Cul- ture”, in Geertz C., The Interpretation of Cultures, New-York: Bas Books, p. 3-30.

Gobo C. (2004), “ Sampling, Representa- tiveness and Generalizability”, in Seale C., Gobo G., Gubrium J. et Silverman D., Qualitative Research Practice, Sage Pub- lications.

Gobble M.A. (2012), “Defining Open”, Re- search-Technology Management, July- August, p. 58-60.

Gomm R., Hammersley M., Foster P. (2000), Case study method: key issues, key texts. Sage, London.

Evers C.W., Wu E.H. (2006), “ On General- ising from Single Case Studies : Episte- mological Reflections”, Journal of Philos- ophy of Education, vol. 40, n°4, 511-526.

Habib J. (2010), “La dynamique de création de connaissances dans les processus d’innovation : Analyse comparée de quatre études de cas dans le secteur de la santé électronique”, Systèmes d’Infor- mation et Management, vol. 15, n°4, p. 93-140.

Hagedoorn, J. (2003), “Sharing intellectual property rights - an exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies”, In-

dustrial and Corporate Change, vol. 12, n°5, p. 1035-1050.

Henkel J., Baldwin C., Y, ShiH W. (2013), “IP modularity: profiting from innovation by aligning product architecture with in- tellectual property”, California Manage- ment Review, vol. 55, n°4, p.65-82.

Huizingh E.K.R.E. (2011), “Open innova- tion: state of art and future perspectives”, Technovation, vol. 31, p. 2–9.

Iansiti M., Levien R. (2004), The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability, HBS Press, Boston.

Isckia T. (2011), “ Ecosystème d’affaires, stratégies de plateforme et innovation ouverte : vers une approche intégrée de la dynamique d’innovation”, Manage- ment & Avenir, vol. 6, n°46, p. 157-176.

Isckia T., Lescop D. (2013), “Platform- based Ecosystems: Leveraging Network Centric Innovation”, in Understanding Business Ecosystems: How Firms Succeed in the New World of Convergence, S. Ben Letaïfa, A. Gratacap and T. Isckia (eds),De Boeck, p. 97-111.

Janicot C., Mignon S. (2008), “ Vers un mo- dèle de codification des connaissances : nature et perspectives”, Systèmes d’Infor- mation et Management, vol. 13, n°4, p. 1-31.

Khalil C., Dudezert A. (2014), “Entre auto- nomie et contrôle : quelle régulation pour les systèmes de gestion des connaissances ?”, Systèmes d’Information et Management, vol. 19, n°1, p.51-76.

Koenig G. (2012), “Le concept d’écosystè- me d’affaires revisité”, M@n@gement, vol. 15, n°2, p. 208-224.

Laursen K., Salter A.J.,(2004), “Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation ?”,


Research Policy, vol. 33, n°8, p. 1201- 1215.

Leten B., Vanhaverbeke W., Roijakkers N., Clerix A., Van Helleputte J. (2013), “IP models to orechestrate innovation ecosystems: IMEC, a public research in- stitute in nano-electronics”, California management review, vol. 55, n°4, p.51- 64.

Lessig L. (2001), The Future of Ideas, Vin- tage Books, New York.

Lessig L. (2004), Free Culture: The nature and future of creativity, Penguin books.

Loilier T., Malherbe M. (2013), “Experimen- tation and the development of eco-sys- temic competencies in the field of con- tactless mobile services”, in Understanding business ecosystems, S. Ben Letaifa (ed.), De Boeck, Paris, p.193- 207.

Merminod V., “TIC, partage de connais- sances et fiabilité du développement de produit distribué : une approche par le “glitch” au sein du Groupe SEB”, Sys- tèmes d’Information et Management, vol.12, n°1, p. 11-38.

Musca G. (2006), Une stratégie de re- cherche processuelle : l’étude longitudi- nale de cas enchâssés, M@n@gement, vol. 9, n°3, p.145-168.

Nonaka I. (1994), “A dynamic theory of or- ganizational knowledge creation”, Orga- nization Science, vol.5, n°1, p.14-37.

Nonaka I., Takeuchi. H. (1995), The knowl- edge-creation company: how japanese companies create the dynamics of inno- vation, Oxford Universuty Press, New York.

Parker G., Van Alstyne M. (2013), “Innova- tion, Openness and platform control”, SSRN.com working paper.

Pastorelly N., Benouali H., Leblanc C., Mi- randa S., Attour A. (2011), « Nice Futur Campus, un bouquet de services NFC

dans une carte virtuelle étudiant », RTSI- Ingénierie des systèmes d’information, vol.16, n°04, p.63-86.

Pénin J., Wack J.P. (2008), “Research tool patents and free-libre biotechnoloy : a suggested unified framework ”, Research Policy, n°37, p.1909-1921.

Pénin J. (2013), “Are you open ? An inves- tigation of the concept of openness for the knowledge and innovation ?”, Revue Economique, n°64, p.133-148.

Pénin J. (2010a), « Quelle politique de li- cence de brevet pour les organismes pu- blics de recherche », Management Inter- national, vol. 14, n°3, p. 47-59.

Pénin J. (2010b), « Le problème des « patent trolls » : comment limiter la spéculation sur la propriété intellectuelle dans une économie fondée sur les connaissances ? », Innovations, n°32, p. 35-53.

Pénin J., Burger-Helmchen T., Dintrich A., Guittard C., Schenk E. (2013), L’innova- tion ouverte Définition, pratiques et pers- pectives, Prospectives et entreprise, Eclai- rage sur les entreprises dans un monde ouvert, CCI Paris Ile-de-France.

Rayna T., Striukova L., (2010), “ Large-Scale Open Innovation: Open Source vs. Pa- tent Pools”, International Journal of Technology Management, n°3-4, p.477- 496.

Rey P., Salan D. (2008), “Abuse of domi- nance and licensing of intellectual prop- erty”, MPRA Paper 9454, University li- brary of Munich, Germany.

Reix R. (1995), “Savoir tacite et savoir for- malisé dans l’entreprise”, Revue Françai- se de Getsion, n° 105, septembre-octobre, p.17-28.

Rochet J.C., Tirole J. (2006), “Two-Sided Market: a progress report”, The Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 3, n°35, p. 645-667.


Saad I., Grundstein M., Rosenthal-Sabroux C. (2009), “Une méthode d’aide à l’iden- tification des connaissances cruciales de l’entreprise”, Systèmes d’Information et Management, n°3, vol. 14, p.43-76.

Saglietto L. (2007), “De la place des marchés électroniques à l’EA d’affaires : le cas des systèmes de réservations aériennes et tou- ristiques”, Système d’information et ma- nagement, vol. 12, n°3, p.77-94.

Simcoe, T.S., Graham S.H.J., Fledman M.P. (2009), “Competing on Standards? En- trepreneurship, Intellectual Property, and Platform Technologies”, Journal of Eco- nomics & Management Strategy, vol. 18, n°3, p. 775-816.

Spender P.M. (1993), “Competitive advan- tage from tacit knowledge: unpacking the concept and its strategic implica- tions”, proceedings de l’Academy of Man- agement Annual Meeting, Atlanta, 8 août.

Stake R.E., (1995), The Art of Case Study Research., Sage Publications, London.

Tushman M.L., Nadler D.A. (1978), “Infor- mation processing as an integrating con-

cept in organization design”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 3, n°3, p. 613- 624.

Van de Ven A.H., Huber G.P. (1990), “Lon- gitudinal field research methods for studying processes of organizational change”, Organization Science, vol. 1, n°3, p. 213-219.

Van de Vrande V., Vanhaverbeke W., Grassmann O. (2010), “Broadening the scope of open innovation: past research, current state and future directions“, Inter- national Journal of Technology Manage- ment, vol. 52, n°3/4, p. 221-235.

West J., Salter A., Vanhaverbeke W., Ches- brough H. (2014), “Open Innovation: The next decade”, Research Policy, n°43, p. 805-811.

Yin R.L. (2003), Application of Case Study Research, Applied Social Research Series, Second Edition, Sage Publications.

Les Echos, dossier spécial propriété indus- trielle et intellectuelle, “NFC, les brevets de la discorde”, vendredi 12 et samedi 13 juin 2015.





Empirical research