Technological competition: a path towards commoditization or differentiation? Some evidence from the e-book readers’ comparison
Keywords:
creative industries, book publishing industry, business models, e-book, repeated innovationAbstract
Technological rivalry is recognized as a key dimension of competition and innovation strategies in the digital era. It is particularly important in strategies focused on disruptive and repeated innovations, where each step contributes to shaping the design of the offer- ing, the structuring of the market and the value chain. These technological trajectories are built on the basis of tensions between two contradictory objectives: specialization aimed at creating proprietary systems and standardization aimed at supplying the overall market. In the former case, successive innovations support competition between exclusive and proprietary ecosystems. In the latter case, commoditized devices create opportunities for alternative actors to engage in innovation and value creation. The e-book reader market serves as a key example of the issues at stake in terms of technological rivalry among tech- nology suppliers, digital platforms, and publishers.
References
Aldrich H. E., Pfeffer J. (1976), “Environ- ments of Organizations”, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 2, pp. 79-105.
Aldrich, H.E., and Ruef, M. (2006), Organi- zations Evolving, Sage, London.
Baden-Fuller C., Haefliger S. (2013), “Busi- ness Models and Technological Innova- tion”, Long Range Planning, vol. 46, pp. 419-426.
Benghozi P.-J. (1990) “Managing Innova- tion: from ad hoc to Routine in French Telecom”, Organization Studies, N° 11/4, pp. 531-554.
Benghozi P.-J. (2014), “Plateformes : quels enjeux pour la régulation?”, Les Cahiers de l’Arcep, October, pp. 56-57.
Benghozi P.-J., Salvador E. (2014) “Strate- gies and business models of online plat- forms in CCIs: convergence or differenti- ation in the e-book sector?”, in Schramme A., Kooyman R. (Ed.), Ha- goort G. (2014), “Beyond Frames. Dy- namics between the creative industries, knowledge institutions and the urban context”, Eburon Academic Press, Delft, ISBN 9789059728844, pp. 96-104.
Benghozi P.-J., Salvador E. (2015), “How and Where the R&D Takes Place in Cre- ative Industries? Digital Investment Strategies of the Book Publishing Sec- tor”, article presented at the XXIVe Con- férence Internationale de Management Stratégique, AIMS, 3-5 June, Paris.
Benghozi, P.J., Paris T. (2007) “The eco- nomics and business models of prescrip- tion in the Internet” in Brousseau E. and N. Curien N. [eds.] Internet and Digital Economics – Principles, Methods and Ap- plications, Cambridge (Mass), Cambridge University Press, pp. 291−310.
Bengtsson M., Kock S. (2014), “Coopeti- tion-Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges”, Industrial Mar- keting Management, vol. 43, pp. 180- 188.
Benhamou F. (2014), Le Livre à l’heure nu- mérique. Papier, écrans, vers un nou- veau vagabondage, Paris, Seuil.
TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETITION: A PATH TOWARDS COMMODITIZATION OR DIFFERENTIATION?...
Blanc A., Huault I. (2014), “Against the dig- ital revolution? Institutional maintenance and artefacts within the French recorded music industry”, Technological Forecast- ing & Social Change, vol. 83, pp. 10-23.
Blind K. (2009), “Standardisation: A Cata- lyst for Innovation”, Inaugural Address, Rotterdam School of Management, Eras- mus Universiteit Rotterdam (August).
Bouncken R. B., Fredrich V. (2012), “Coopetition: performance implications and management antecedents”, Interna- tional Journal of Innovation Manage- ment, vol. 16, n° 5, pp. 1-28.
Brandenburger A. M., Nalebuff B. J. (1996), “Co-opetition”, Currency Doubleday, New York.
Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.M. (1998), Com- peting on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Carr, N. G. (2004), “Does IT matter? Infor- mation Technology and the Corrosion of Competitive Advantage”, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Cecere G., Corrocher N., Battaglia R. D. (2015), “Innovation and competition in the smartphone industry: is there a dom- inant design?”, Telecommunications Pol- icy, vol. 39, pp. 162-175.
Chalant I., Lecloux V. (2010), “L’innovation technologique en reseau: les defis de la coopetition”, Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l’Education, Psychologie Sociale des Groupes et des Organisations Jean-François Leroy, Université de Liège, 20p.
Chamaret C. (2011), “Comment échapper à la commoditisation”, Gérer et Com- prendre, vol. 104, n° 2. pp. 102-104.
Chamaret C. (2012), “Rôles et stratégies des firmes face à la commoditisation. Le cas des moteurs de recherche en entreprise”, Thesis presented on the 2nd of March
for the degree of Doctor of Ecole polytechnique, economy and social sci- ences sector. Specialty: management, pages 1-355.
Chandra Y., Yang S.-J. S. (2012), « Manag- ing disruptive innovation. Entrepreneuri- al strategies and tournaments for corpo- rate longevity », Journal of General Management, vol. 37, n° 2, pp. 23-50.
Christensen C. (1997), The innovator’s dilemma, Boston MA, USA, Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen C., Raynor E. M. (2003), The innovator’s solution: creating and sus- taining successful growth, Harvard Busi- ness Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chrystal, R. (2010) ‘The Evolution of e- Books: Technology and Related Issues’, Digital Libraries, INFO, pp. 1–47.
Corsi S., Di Minin A. (2014), “Disruptive in- novation...in reverse: adding a geograph- ical dimension to disruptive innovation theory”, Creativity and Innovation Man- agement, vol. 23, n° 1, pp. 76-90.
Dacos M., Mounier P. (2010), “L’Édition électronique”, collection Repères, Paris, La Découverte, ISBN: 978 2 70715729 4.
Dahl J. (2014), “Conceptualizing coopeti- tion as a process: an outline of change in cooperative and competitive interac- tions”, Industrial Marketing Manage- ment, vol. 43, pp. 272-279.
David P. A. (1985), “Clio and the Eco- nomics of QWERTY”, The American Eco- nomic Review, vol. 75, n° 2, pp. 332-337.
Deltour F., Lethiais V. (2014), « L’innovation en PME et son accompagnement par les TIC : quels effets sur la performance ? », Systèmes d’Information et Management, vol. 19, n° 2, pp. 1-25.
Dumoulin R., Simon E. (2005), “Stratégie de rupture et PME: la replication impos- sible », Revue Française de Gestion, 2005/2, n° 155, pp. 75-95.
SYSTÈMES D’INFORMATION ET MANAGEMENT
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), « Building theo- ries from case study research », Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, pp. 532– 550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E. (2007), “Theory building from cases: opportuni- ties and challenges”, Academy of Man- agement Review, vol. 50, n° 1, pp. 25-32.
European Commission (2005) ‘Publishing Market Watch: final report’.
Fitzgerald B. (2006), “The transformation of Open Source Software”, MIS Quarter- ly, vol. 30, n° 3, pp. 587-598.
Gawer, A. (2009), Ed., Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
Gawer, A., Cusumano, M. A. (2002), Plat- form Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation, Boston, Massachusetts, Harvard Business School Press.
Gaymard, H. (2009), “Situation du livre. Évaluation de la loi relative au prix du livre et questions prospective”, Rapport à la Ministre de la Culture et de la Commu- nication.
Gnyawali D. R., Park B.-J. (2011), “Co-ope- tition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innova- tion”, Research Policy, vol. 40, n° 5, pp. 650-663.
Goolsbee A., Syverson C. (2008), “How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? Evidence from the major airlines”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, November, pp. 1611-1633.
Greco A. (2005), The book publishing indus- try, second edition, Mahwah, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Greco A. (2011), The book publishing in- dustry, Taylor&Francis.
Habtay S. R. (2012), “A firm-level analysis on the relative difference between tech-
nology-driven and market-driven disrup- tive business model innovations”, Cre- ativity and Innovation Management, vol. 21, n° 3, pp. 290-303.
Hamel G., Doz Y. L., Prahalad C. K. (1989), “Collaborate with your competitors and win”, Harvard Business Review, January- February, pp. 133-139.
Hamel, G. (1998), “The challenge today: Changing the rules of the game”, Busi- ness Strategy Review, vol. 9, n° 2, pp. 19- 26.
Hammer M. (2004), “Deep change. How operational innovation can transform your company”, Harvard Business Re- view, April, pp. 84-93.
Hannan, M.T. (2005), ‘Ecologies of organi- zations: diversity and identity’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol 19, No 1, pp 51–70.
Hannan, M.T., Baron, J.N., Hsu, G., and Kocak, O. (2006), ‘Organizational identi- ties and the hazard of change’, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol 15, No 5, pp 755–784.
Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P. (2006), “Growth of the firm by repeated innova- tion: towards a new microeconomics based on design functions”, paper pre- sented at the 11th International Schum- peterian Society, Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, 21st-24th June, France, 18p.
Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., Weil B. (2001), “From R&D to R-I-D: design strategies and the management of “innovation fields””, 8th International Product Devel- opment Management conference, En- schede, June, 16p.
Howard N. (2009), “The Book: The Life Story of a Technology”, The Johns Hop- kins University Press, Baltimore, MD, ISBN 978-0-8018-9311-7.
Hsieh, C. C., Chen, J. W., Luo, D., Lu, C. C. and Huang, Y. L. (2011) ‘Insights from
TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETITION: A PATH TOWARDS COMMODITIZATION OR DIFFERENTIATION?...
the Technology System Method for the Development Architecture of e-Text- books’, In ICDS 2011, The Fifth Interna- tional Conference on Digital Society, pp. 205–209.
Katz, M. L, Shapiro, C. (1986), “Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Ex- ternalities”, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(4), pp. 822-841.
Klenner P., Husig S., Dowling M. (2013), “Ex-ante evaluation of disruptive suscep- tibility in established value networks – When are markets ready for disruptive innovations?”, Research Policy, vol. 42, pp. 914-927.
Larribeau S., Pénard T. (2003), “Que peut- on dire des stratégies tarifaires sur Inter- net ? Une étude économétrique sur la vente en ligne de CD en France », Sys- tèmes d’Information et Management, vol. 8, n° 3, pp. 29-54.
Le Roy F., Sanou F. H. (2014), « Stratégie de coopétition et performance de marché : une étude empirique », Management In- ternational, vol. 18, n° 2, pp. 124-139.
Lebert, M. (2009), “A short history of ebooks”, NEF, University of Toronto.
Lessig L. (2006), Code and the other laws of cyberspace, Version 2.0, New York, Basic Books.
Lewin, A. Y., Volberda, H. W. (1999), “Proglomena on Coevolution: A Frame- work for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms”, Organization Science, vol. 10, n° 5. Sept.-Oct. pp. 519- 534.
Loebbecke, C., Soehnel, A., Weniger, S. and Weiss, T. (2010) ‘Innovating for the Mobile End-User Market: Amazon’s Kin- dle 2 Strategy as Emerging Business Model’, In Mobile Business and 2010 Ninth Global Mobility Roundtable (ICMB-GMR) International Conference, pp. 51–57.
Lyubareva I., Benghozi P.-J., Fidele T. (2013), Online Business Models in Cre- ative Industries: Diversity and Structure, Journal of International Studies in Man- agement and Organization, forthcom- ing.
MarketLine (2013), Amazon’s Kindle: dom- inating the e-book market while selling at cost price, MarketLine case-study, Jan- uary, pp. 1-20.
Markides C. (1998), “Strategic innovation in established companies”, Sloan Manage- ment Review, vol. 39, n° 3, pp. 31-42.
McGahan A. M. (2004), “How industries change”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 82, n° 10, pp. 86-94.
Miller C. (2013), “Digital-media transforma- tion: what the e-book industry can teach us about selling digital content”, Infor- ma, Telecoms&Media, pp. 6-12.
Murmann, J. P. (2003), The Coevolution of Industries and Academic Institutions: Theory and Evidence, Unpublished.
OECD (2012) ‘E-books: Developments and Policy Considerations’, OECD Digital Economy Papers n°. 208.
Park, A., Lee, K. J. and Casalegno, F. (2010) ‘The three dimensions of book evolution in ubiquitous computing age: Digitaliza- tion, augmentation, and hypermedia- tion’, In Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing (SUTC), 2010 IEEE International Conference, pp. 374–378.
Patino, B. (2008) ‘Rapport sur le livre nu- mérique’, Ministère de la culture et de la communication.
Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. (1978), “The exter- nal control of organizations. A resource dependence perspective”, New York, Harper&Row.
Piccoli G., Lui T.-W. (2014), “The competi- tive impact of information technology: can commodity IT contribute to compet-
SYSTÈMES D’INFORMATION ET MANAGEMENT
itive performance”, European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 23, n° 6, pp. 616-628.
Quinn J. B. (1978), “Strategic change: “log- ical incrementalism”, Sloan Management Review, vol. 20, n° 1, pp. 7-21.
Ragin C. C., Amoroso L. M. (2011), Con- structing Social Research, The Unity and Diversity of Method, Second Edition, Sage publications.
Raza-Ullah T., Bengtsson M., Kock S. (2014), “The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels”, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 43, pp. 189-198.
Reimann, M., Schilke O., Thomas J. S. (2010), “Toward an understanding of in- dustry commoditization: Its nature and role in evolving marketing competition”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(2) p.188-197.
Riot E. (2013), “L’édition française à l’heure de la rupture du livre numérique”, Entre- prendre&Innover, 2013/2 n° 18, pp. 31- 40.
Ritala P. (2012), « Coopetition strategy- when is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance”, British Journal of Management, vol. 23, pp. 307-324.
Ritala P., Golnam A., Wegmann A. (2014), “Coopetition-based business models: the case of Amazon.com”, Industrial Mar- keting Management, vol. 43, pp. 236- 249.
Ritala P., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P. (2009), “What’s in it for me? Creating and appro- priating value in innovation-related coopetition”, Technovation, vol. 29, issue 12, December, pp. 819–828.
Ritala P., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P. (2013), “Incremental and radical innovation in coopetition-the role of absorptive capac- ity and appropriability”, Journal of Prod-
uct Innovation Management, vol. 30, n° 1, pp. 154-169.
Ritala P., Sainio L.-M. (2014), “Coopetition for radical innovation: technology, mar- ket and business-model perspectives”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Manage- ment, vol. 26, n° 2, pp. 155-169.
Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. (2003), “Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets”, Journal of the European Economic Asso- ciation, MIT Press, vol. 1(4), pp. 990- 1029.
Ronte, H. (2001) ‘The impact of technology on publishing’, Publishing research quarterly, 16(4), pp. 11–22.
Rouet F. (2007), “Le livre: mutations d’une industrie culturelle”, La documentation Française, Paris.
Ruling C.-C., Duymedjian R. (2014), “Digi- tal bricolage: Resources and coordina- tion in the production of digital visual ef- fects”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 83, pp. 98-110.
Sanchez R., Mahoney J. T. (1996), “Modu- larity, flexibility, and knowledge man- agement in product and organization de- sign”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, Winter Special Issue, pp. 63-76.
Schlegelmilch B.B., Diamantopoulos A., Kreutz P. (2003), “Strategic Innovation: The Construct, its Drivers and its Strate- gic Outcomes”, Journal of Strategic Mar- keting, vol. 11, n° 2, p. 117-132.
Schreyögg M., Kliesch-Eberl G. (2007), “How Dynamic can Organizational Capa- bilities be? Towards a dual Process Model of Capability Dynamisation”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, pp. 913-933.
Siggelkow, N. (2007), “Persuasion with case studies”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 50, pp. 20–24.
Simon J. P. (2014), « Ce que le numérique a déjà changé à l’edition », INA Global,
TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETITION: A PATH TOWARDS COMMODITIZATION OR DIFFERENTIATION?...
November, http://www.inaglobal.fr/edi- tion/article/ce-que-le-numerique-deja- change-ledition-7977
Simon, J. P. and de Prato, G. (2012) Statis- tical, Ecosystems and Competitiveness Analysis of the Media and Content Indus- tries: the Book Publishing Industry, JRC Technical Reports, European Commis- sion.
Sotarauta M., Srinivas S. (2005), “The Co- Evolution of Policy and Economic Devel- opment: A Discussion on Innovative Re- gions”, MIT IPC Local Innovation Systems Working Paper, MIT-IPC-LIS-05- 001, 48p.
Swann P. (2010), “The economics of stan- dardization: an update”, Report for the UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), Innovative Economics Limited, pp. 1-83.
Teece D. J. (2010), “Business Models, Busi- ness Strategy and Innovation”, Long Range Planning, vol. 43, pp. 172-194.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strate- gic management”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, pp. 509–533.
Thomke S.H. (1998), “Managing experi- mentation in the design of new prod- ucts”, Management Science, vol. 44, n° 6, p. 743-762.
Tran S. (2014), « Quelle contribution des technologies collaboratives à la configu- ration des organisations ? », Systèmes d’Information et Management, vol. 19, n° 2, pp. 1-31.
Tyre M., Orlikowski W.J. (1994), “Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organiza- tions”, Organization Science, vol. 5, pp. 98-118.
Vitari C., Ravarini A. (2009), “A longitudinal analysis of trajectory changes in the soft- ware industry: the case of the content
management application segment”, Eu- ropean Journal of Information Systems, vol. 18, pp. 249-263.
Volberda H. W, Lewin A.Y. (2003), “Guest editors’ introduction – Coevolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co-evolution”, Journal of management studies, Vol 40, n° 8, pp. 2111-2136.
Von Hippel E. (2005), “Democratizing in- novation”, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Yami S., Castaldo S., Dagnino G. B., Le Roy F. (2010), Coopetition: winning strategies for the 21st century, Cheltenham, Ed- ward Elgar.
Yu D., Hang C. C. (2010), “A reflective re- view of disruptive innovation theory”, International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 12, pp. 435-452.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.
It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:
- ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
- it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.
In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:
- The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
- The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).
