Proposition of a new collaborative method to study the concept of absorptive capacity
Keywords:
Collaborative method, Absorptive Capacity, Practices, RoutinesAbstract
Absorptive capacity (ACAP) is considered as a dynamic capability based on organisational routines and practices. In information systems, and more generally in management science, most of the current methodological approaches cannot describe these routines and practices on a micro level. This paper presents the research methods that are usually used to study the concept of ACAP. By comparing these methods, we identify their limits and we provide the guidelines to apply a new collaborative research method called ISEACAP (Identification, Simulation, Evaluation, Assimilation of ACAP practices). This method follows a “practice-based” perspective and relies more specifically on the co-creation of new knowledge from both practitioners and researchers. ISEACAP is a gamified participative method to study ACAP’s practices in more depth. This paper presents ISEACAP as a new research method that entails a reflexive disposition from the practitioners about their practices and allows researchers to better understand ACAP mechanisms. Moreover, the method facilitates the study of mobilised organisational routines and practices (consciously or unconsciously) by actors to create and develop any kind of dynamic capabilities.
References
Agogué M., Levillain K., Hooge S. (2015), “Gamification of creativity: exploring the usefulness of serious games for ideation”, Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 24, n°3, p. 415–429.
Allard-Poesi F., Perret V. (2014), « Fondements épistémologiques de la recherche ». In R.-A. Thiétart (eds.), Méthodes de recherche en management, Dunod, Paris, p. 14–46.
Amabilé S., Meissonier R., Haller C., Boudrandi S. (2012), « Capacité d’absorption des informations et pratiques de veille stratégique dans les PME : une étude sur des domaines vitivinicoles provençaux », Systèmes d’Information & Management, vol. 17, n°3, p. 111–142.
Avenier M.-J. (2009), « Franchir un fossé réputé infranchissable : construire des savoirs scientifiques pertinents pour la pratique », Management & Avenir, vol. 30, n°10, p. 188–206.
Avenier M.-J., Parmentier Cajaiba A. (2012), “The dialogical model: Developing academic knowledge for and from practice”, European Management Review, vol. 9, n°4, p. 199–212.
Avenier M.-J., Thomas C. (2015), “Finding one’s way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks”, Systèmes d’Information & Management, vol. 20, n°1, p. 61–98.
Avison D., Malaurent J. (2014), “Qualitative research in three IS journals: Unequal emphasis but common rigour, depth and richness”, Systèmes d’Information & Management, vol. 18, n°4, p. 75–123.
Ayerbe C., Missonier A. (2007), « Validité interne et validité externe de l’étude de cas : Principes et mise en oeuvre pour un renforcement mutuel », Finance Contrôle Stratégie, vol. 10, n°2, p. 37–62.
Behera S. R. (2015), “Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? The role of horizontal and vertical spillovers and absorptive capacity”, Journal of Economic Development, vol. 40, n°2, p. 57–87.
Béjean M., Moisdon J.-C. (2017), « Recherche-intervention et Living Labs, une même lignée de « recherches immersives » ? », Annales Des Mines - Réalités Industrielles, vol. 2, p. 54–59.
Belderbos R., Gilsing V. A., Suzuki S. (2015), “Direct and mediated ties to universities: “Scientific” absorptive capacity and innovation performance of pharmaceutical firms”, Strategic Organization, vol. 14, n°1, p. 32–52.
Belmondo C., Dejean F. (2009), « L’émergence des pratiques stratégiques et leur transformation en routines : Une analyse comparative des activités d’une cellule de veille concurrentielle », XVIIIème Conférence de l’AIMS, Lille, France.
Belmondo C., Sargis Roussel C. (2012), « Apprendre à apprendre : Une perspective intégrative de l’émergence des routines d’apprentissage, Systèmes d’Information & Management, vol. 13, n°3, p. 71–110.
Benhayoun Sadafiyine L., Le Dain M. A., Prudhomme G., Dominguez-Péry C. (2017), “Designing a maturity grid to measure the absorptive capacity of an SME embedded in a collaborative innovation network”, Innovation and Product Development Management Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Buckley P. J., Park B. Il. (2014), “Realised absorptive capacity, technology acquisition and performance in international collaborative formations: An empirical examination in the Korean context”, Asia Pacific Business Review, vol. 20, n°1, p. 109–135.
Campbell D. T., Stanley J. C. (1966), Experimental and quasi experimental designs for research, Rand McNally College Publishing Company, Chicago, USA.
Chanal V., Lesca H., Martinet A.-C. (1997), « Vers une ingénierie de la recherche en sciences de gestion », Revue Française de Gestion, vol. 253, n°8, p. 213–229.
Coghlan D., Brydon-Miller M. (2014), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research, SAGE Publications Ltd.
Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. (1990), “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, n°1, p. 128–152.
Davenport T. H., Javenpaa S., Beers M. (1996), “Improving knowledge work processes”, Sloan Management Review, vol. 37, n°4, p. 53–65.
David A. (1999), « Logique, épistémologie et méthodologie en sciences de gestion », VIIIème Conférence de l’AIMS, Paris, France.
David A. (2008), « La recherche-intervention, cadre général pour la recherche en management », In A. David, A. Hatchuel, R. Laufer (eds.), Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion. Vuibert, Paris, p. 193–214.
David M., Rowe F. (2015), « Le rôle des systèmes d’information d’entreprise dans l’évolutivité des routines organisationnelles », Finance Contrôle Stratégie, vol. 18, n°4, p. 1–27.
De Benedittis J. (2016), La capitalisation des connaissances inter-organisationnelle au sein des clusters : capacités dynamiques et rôle des acteurs-frontières pour soutenir la transition inter-organisations temporaires, Thèse de Doctorat, Université Grenoble-Alpes.
Demers C. (2003), « L’entretien », In Y. Giordano (eds.), Conduire un projet de recherche. Une perspective qualitative, Editions EMS, Paris, p. 173–210.
Deterding S., Dixon D., Khaled R., Nacke L. (2011), “From game design elements to gamefulness”, In 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference on Envisioning Future Media Environments, ACM Press, New-York, USA.
Di Stefano G., Peteraf M., Verona G. (2014), “The organizational drivetrain: A road to integration of dynamic capabilities research”, Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 28, n°4, p. 307–327.
Dionysiou D. D., Tsoukas H. (2013), “Understanding the (re) creation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionist perspective”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 38, n°2, p. 181–205.
Duchek S. (2013), “Capturing absorptive capacity: A critical review and future prospects**”, Schmalenbach Business Review, vol. 65, n°3, p. 312–329.
Ebers M., Maurer I. (2014), “Connections count: How relational embeddedness and relational empowerment foster absorptive capacity”, Research Policy, vol. 43, n°2, p. 318–332.
Engelen A., Kube H., Schmidt S., Flatten T. C. (2014), “Entrepreneurial orientation in turbulent environments: The moderating role of absorptive capacity”, Research Policy, vol. 43, n°8, p. 1353–1369.
Expósito-Langa M., Molina-Morales F. X., Tomás-Miquel J.-V. (2015), “How shared vision moderates the effects of absorptive capacity and networking on clustered firms’ innovation”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 31, n°3, p. 293–302.
Fauré B., Rouleau L. (2011), “The strategic competence of accountants and middle managers in budget making”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 36, n°3, p. 167–182.
Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. (2003), “Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 48, n°1, p. 94–118.
Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T., D’Adderio L. D., Lazaric N. (2016), “Beyond routines as things : Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics”, Organization Science, vol. 27, n°3, p. 505–513.
Flatten T. C., Adams D., Brettel M. (2015), “Fostering absorptive capacity through leadership: A cross-cultural analysis”, Journal of World Business, vol. 50, n°3, p. 519–534.
Franco C., Marzucchi A., Montresor S. (2014), “Absorptive capacity, proximity in cooperation and integration mechanisms. Empirical evidence from CIS data”, Industry & Innovation, vol. 21, n°4, p. 332–357.
Front A., Rieu D., Santorum M. (2014), « A participative end-user modeling approach for business process requirements”, In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 175, p. 33–47.
Front A., Rieu D., Santorum M., Movahedian F. (2017), “A participative end-user method for multi-perspective business process elicitation and improvement”, Software & Systems Modeling, vol. 16, n°3, p. 691–714.
Gonzalez-Laporte C. (2014), Recherche-action participative, collaborative, intervention... Quelles explicitations ? Thèse de Doctorat, Grenoble.
Helfat C. E., Peteraf M. A. (2015), “Managerial cognitive capabilities and the Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 36, n°6, p. 831–850.
Hlady Rispal M. (2002), La méthode des cas : Application à la recherche en gestion, De Boeck université, Bruxelles, Belgique.
Hotho J. J., Becker-Ritterspach F., Saka-Helmhout A. (2012), “Enriching absorptive capacity through social interaction”, British Journal of Management, vol. 23, n°3, p. 383–401.
Howard-Grenville J. A. (2005), “The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context”, Organization Science, vol. 16, n°6, p. 618–636.
Johnson P., Duberley J. (2003), “Reflexivity in management research*”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 40, n°5, p. 1279–1303.
Kim M. (2015), “Productivity spillovers from FDI and the role of domestic firm’s absorptive capacity in South Korean manufacturing industries”, Empirical Economics, vol. 48, n°2, p. 807–827.
Langley A. (1999), “Strategies for theorizing from process data”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 24, n°4, p. 691–710.
Larivière N., Briand C., Corbière M. (2014), « Les approches de recherche participatives : Illustration d’un partenariat pour l’amélioration des pratiques de réadaptation en santé mentale au Québec », In M. Corbière, N. Larivière (eds.), Méthodes qualitatives, quantitatives et mixtes dans la recherche en sciences humaines, sociales et de la santé, Presse de l’Université du Québec, p. 649-675.
Le Moigne J.-L. (1990), « Epistémologies constructivistes et sciences de l’organisation », In A.-C. Martinet (eds.), Epistémologies et Sciences de Gestion, Economica, Paris, France, p. 81-140.
Legris P., Ingham J., Collerette P. (2003), “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, vol. 40, n°3, p. 191–204.
Lewin A. Y., Massini S., Peeters C. (2011), “Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines”, Organization Science, vol. 22, n°1, p. 81–98.
Limaj E., Bernroider E. W. N., Choudrie J. (2016), “The impact of social information system governance, utilization, and capabilities on absorptive capacity and innovation: A case of Austrian SMEs”, Information and Management, vol. 53, n°3, p. 380–397.
Lombard M., Snyder-Duch J., Bracken C. C. (2002), “Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability”, Human Communication Research, vol. 28, n°4, p. 587–604.
McGonigal J. (2011), Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the work, Penguin Press.
Mignon S., Siadou-Martin B., Janicot C., Averseng C., Mazars-Chapelon A. (2012), « Management des connaissances : quels dispositifs pour quels objectifs », Systèmes d’Information & Management, vol. 17, n°3, p. 33–70.
Moilanen M., Ostbye S., Woll K. (2014), “Non-R&D SMEs: External knowledge, absorptive capacity and product innovation”, Small Business Economics, vol. 43, n°2, p. 447–462.
Morrissette J. (2013), « Recherche-action et recherche collaborative. Quel rapport aux savoirs et à la production de savoirs ? », Nouvelles Pratiques Sociales, vol. 25, n°2, p. 35–49.
Mougin J., Boujut J.-F., Pourroy F., Poussier G. (2015), “Modelling knowledge transfer: A knowledge dynamics perspective”, Concurrent Engineering : Research and Applications, vol. 23, n°4, p. 308–319.
Müller-Seitz G., Guttel W. (2014), “Toward a choreography of congregating: A practice-based perspective on organizational absorptive capacity in a semiconductor industry consortium”, Management Learning, vol. 45, n°4, p. 477–497.
Nicolini D. (2009), “Zooming in and zooming out: A package of method and theory to study work practices”, Organization Studies, vol. 30, n°12, p. 1391–1418.
Orlikowski W. J. (2002), “Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing”, Organization Science, vol. 13, n°3, p. 249–273.
Papas N., O’Keefe R. M., Seltsikas P. (2012), “The action research vs design science debate: Reflections from an intervention in eGovernment”, European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 21, n°2, p. 147–159.
Pascal A. (2012), « Le design science dans le domaine des systèmes d’information : Mise en débat et perspectives », Systèmes d’Information & Management, vol. 17, n°3, p. 7–31.
Pasmore W. A., Stymne B., Shani A. B., Mohrman S. A., Adler N. (2007), “The promise of collaborative management research”, In A. B. Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne, N. Adler (eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research, Sage Publications Inc., p. 7–31.
Pentland B. T. (1995), “Information systems and organizational learning: The social epistemology of organizational knowledge systems”, Accounting, Management & Information Technologies, vol. 5, n°1, p. 1–21.
Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. (2008), “Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action”, Information and Organization, vol. 18, n°4, p. 235–250.
Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S., Becker M. C., Liu P. (2012), “Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 49, n°8, p. 1484–1508.
Popaitoon S., Siengthai S. (2014), “The moderating effect of human resource management practices on the relationship between knowledge absorptive capacity and project performance in project-oriented companies”, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 32, n°6, p. 908–920.
Roberts N., Galluch P. S., Dinger M., Grover V. (2012), “Absorptive capacity and information systems research: Review, synthesis, and directions for future research”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 36, n°2, p. 625–648.
Rowe F. (2014), “What literature review is not: Diversity, boundaries and recommendations”, European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 23, n°3, p. 241–255.
Sebillotte M. (2001), « Les fondements épistémologiques de l’évaluation des recherches tournées vers l’action », Natures Sciences Societes, vol. 9, n°3, p. 8–15.
Sein M. K., Henfridsson O., Purao S., Rossi M., Lindgren R. (2011), “Action Design Research”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 35, n°1, p. 37–56.
Stefanovic I., Prokic S., Săvolu G., Simăn I. lorga. (2014), “Building a conceptual model of routines, capabilities, and absorptive capacity interplay”, Management - Journal for Theory and Practice of Management, vol. 19, n°73, p. 5–16.
Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, n°7, p. 509–533.
Ter Wal A., Criscuolo P., Salter A. (2011), “Absorptive capacity at the individual level: An ambidexterity approach to external engagement”, In DRUID, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Todorova G., Durisin, B. (2007), “Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, n°3, p. 774–786.
Trimble M., Lazaro, M. (2014), “Evaluation criteria for participatory research: Insights from coastal Uruguay”, Environmental Management, vol. 54, n°1, p. 122–137.
Urquhart C., Vaast E. (2012), “Building social media theory from case studies: A new frontier for IS research”, 33rd International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando, USA.
Vaara E., Whittington R. (2012), “Strategy-as-Practice: Taking social practices seriously”, The Academy of Management Annals, vol. 6, n°1, p. 285–336.
Van de Ven A. H. (2007), « Designing process studies”, In A. H. van de Ven (eds.), Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press, p. 194-231.
Venkatesh V., Brown S. A., Bala H. (2013), “Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research in information systems”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 37, n°3, p. 21–54.
Vicente-Oliva S., Martínez-Sánchez Á., Berges-Muro L. (2015), “Research and development project management best practices and absorptive capacity: Empirical evidence from Spanish firms”, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 33, n°8, p. 1704–1716.
Weaver L., Cousins J. B. (2005), “Unpacking the participatory process”, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, vol. 1, p. 19–40.
Yin R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods, Sage Publications.
Zahra S. A., George G. (2002), “Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 27, n°2, p. 185–203.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.
It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:
- ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
- it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.
In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:
- The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
- The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).
