Niveaux de virtualité et performance des équipes : Proposition d’une approche multidimensionnelle d’évaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3917/sim.114.0037Keywords:
Team virtuality, Technoligical virtuality, Social virtuality, Virtual teams? performance, ICT use.Abstract
Thanks to the advances in information and communication technologies (ICTs), virtual teams have become a reality in an increasing number of companies. Despite the advantages they provide, these teams trigger some concerns about the lack and even the absence of face-to-face communication and their effects on performance. This paper aims to propose a multidimensional approach to assess virtuality based on the identification of two key dimensions: technological and social virtuality. It also analyses virtuality effects on team performance. Technological virtuality is defined as the extent to which virtual team members use media and combine the characteristics of ICTs in order to take full advantage of their objective features. Social virtuality refers to the capacity of virtual team members to adapt ICT use to their tasks and social needs. We show how different combinations of these dimensions levels determine the overall team virtuality level and how the latter influences team performance. The proposed approach was applied to study ten virtual teams using a hybrid methodology based on observation, questionnaire and interviews with team members. We argue that high virtuality level results in low performance however low virtuality results in high performance. Beyond the theoretical contribution of our multidimensional conceptualization of the team virtuality, it can also help managers of virtual teams to better cope with the constraints related to their virtuality and thus improve their performance.References
Anderson, A. H., McEwan, R., Bal, J., Carletta, J. (2007), “Virtual Team Meetings: An Analysis of Communication and Context,” Computers in Human Behaviors, Vol. 23, p. 2558-2580.
Aubert, B.A., Kelsey, B.L. (2003), “Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams”, Small Group Research, Vol. 34, n°5, p.575-618.
Avolio, B. J., Kahaï, S. S., et Dodge, G. E. (2001) “E-leadership: Implications for Theory, Research, and Practice,” Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 11, n°4, p. 615-668.
Beaudry, A., Pinsonneault, A. (2005), “Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: a Coping Model of User Adaptation,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 9, n°3, p. 493-524.
Bélanger, F., Watson-Manheim, M. B. (2006), “Virtual Teams and Multiple Media: Structuring Media Use to Attain Strategic Goals,” Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 15, n°4, p. 299-321.
Bell, B., Kozlowski, S. W. (2002), “A Typology of Virtual Teams, Implications for Effective Leadership,” Group & Organization Management, Vol. 27, n°1, p. 14-49.
Bjorn, P., Ngwenyama, O. (2009), “ Virtual team collaboration : Building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 19, n°3, p.227-253.
Boukef Charki, N., Kalika, M. (2006), “La théorie du millefeuille. Le rôle du contexte”, Système d’information et management, Vol. 11, n°4, p. 29-54.
Cascio, W.F. (2000), “Managing a virtual workplace”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol.14, n°3, p. 17-29.
Chidambaram, L. (1996), “Relational Development in Computer-supported Groups” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, n°2, p.143-165.
Chidambaram, L., Jones, B. (2003), “Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performances: A Comparison of Face-to-face and Dispersed Meetings,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, n°4, p.465- 491.
Chudoba, K. M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., Watson-Manheim, M. B. (2005), “How Virtual Are We? Measuring Virtuality and Understanding its Impact in Global Organization,” Information Systems Journal, Vol.15, p. 279-306.
Coat, F., Favier, M. (2000), “La réalité de la virtualité : Le cas des équipes virtuelles”, 5ème Colloque de l’AIM, 8-10 novembre, Montpellier, France.
Cohen, S. G., Bailey, D. E. (1997), “What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite,” Journal of Management, Vol. 23, n°3, p. 239-290.
Cousins, K. C., Robey, D., Zigurs, I. (2007), “Managing Strategic Coordination in Hybrid Teams”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 16, p. 460-478.
Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H. (1986), “Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design,” Management Science, Vol. 32, p. 554-571.
Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H., Trevino, L.K. (1987), “Message Equivocality, Media Selection and Manager Performance: Implication for Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, n°3, p. 355-366.
Dennis A.R., Fuller R.M., Valacich, J.S. (2008), “Media, Task, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 32, n°3, p. 575-600.
DeSanctis, G., Poole, S. P. (1994), “Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptative structuration theory”, Organization Science, Vol. 5, n°2, p. 121-147.
Dubé, L., Paré, G. (2002), “The Multi-faceted Nature of Virtual Teams,” Cahier du CreSI, Vol. 2, n°11, p. 1-33.
Dubé, L., Robey, D. (2008), “Surviving the Paradoxes of Virtual Teamwork,” Information Systems Journal, Vol. 19, p. 3-30.
Fiol, C. M., O’Connor, E. J. (2005), “Identification in Face-to-face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions,” Organization Science, Vol. 16, n°1, p. 19-32.
Friedman, R.A., Curall, S.C. (2002), “E-mail Escalation: Dispute Exacerbating Elements of Electronic Communication,” in http://www.owen.vanderbilt.edu/ray.friedman/
Fuller, R.M., Dennis A.R. (2009), “Does fit matter? The impact of task-technology fit and appropriation on team performance in repeated tasks”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 20, n 1, p. 2-17.
Fuller, M. A., Hardin, A. M., Davison, R.M. (2006), “Efficacy in Technology-mediated Distributed Teams,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 23, n°3, p. 209-235.
Furumo, K., Pearson, M.J. (2006), “An empirical investigation of how trust cohesion, and performance vary in virtual and face-to-face teams”, Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Science.
Geister, S., Konradt, U., Hertel, G. (2006), “Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and performance in virtual teams”, Small Group Research, Vol.37, n°5, p. 459-489.
Gibson, C. B., Gibbs, J. L. (2006), “Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 51, p. 451-495.
Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., Neale, M. A. (2003), “Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, n°2, p. 265-287.
Hambley, L.A., O’Neill, T.A., Kline, T.J.B. (2007), “Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes”, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 103, p. 1-20.
Hinds, P.J., Bailey, D.E. (2003), “Out of sight, out of synch: understanding conflict in distributed teams”, Organization science, Vol. 14, n°6, p. 615-632.
Iacono, C.S., Weisband, S. (1997), “Developing trust in virtual teams”, 30th Annual Hawaii Conference on System Science.
Järvenpää, S. L., Leidner, D. E. (1999), “Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams,” Organization Science, Vol. 10, n°6, p. 791.
Järvenpää, S.L., Knoll, K., Leidner, D.E. (1998), “Is There Anybody out There ? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, n°4, p. 29-64.
Kirkman, B. L., Mathieu, J. E. (2005), “The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality,” Journal of Management, Vol. 31, n°5, p. 700-718.
Kirkman, B .L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P.E., Gibson, C. B. (2004), “The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: the moderating role of face-to-face interaction”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, n° 2, p. 175-192.
Kotlarsky, J., Oshri, I. (2005), “Social Ties, Knowledge Sharing and Successful Collaboration in Globally Distributed System Development Projects,” European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 14, p. 37-48.
Kratzer, J., Leenders, R.Th.A.J., Van Engelen, J.M.L. (2006), “Managing creative team performance in virtual environments: an empirical study in 44 R&D teams”, Technovation Vol. 26, pp. 42-49.
Lamb, R., Kling, R. (2003), “Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information System Research,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, n°2, p. 197-235.
Langevin, P., Picq, T. (2001), “Contrôle des équipes virtuelles : Une revue”, Cahiers de recherche EM Lyon, N° 2001-04.
Larsen, K.R.T., McInerney, C.R. (2002), “Preparing to work in virtual organization”, Information & Management, Vol. 39, n°6, p. 445-456.
Levina, N., Vaast, E. (2008), “Innovating or Doing as Told? Status Differences and Overlapping Boundaries in Offshore Collaboration,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 32, n°2, p. 307-332.
Lin, C., Standing, G., Liu, Y. C. (2008), “A Model to Develop Effective Virtual Teams,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 45, p. 1031-1045.
Lipnack, J., Stamps, J. (1997), “Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology”, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York.
Lu, M., Watson-Manheim, M. B., Chudoba, K. M, Wynn, E. (2006), “Virtuality and Team Performance: Understanding the Variety of Practices,” Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Vol. 9, n°1, p. 4-23.
Lurey, J.S., Raisinghani, M.S. (2001), “An empirical study of the best practices in the virtual teams”, Information & Management, Vol. 38, n°8, p. 523-544.
Majchrzak, A., Malhorta, A., Stamps, J., Lipnack, J. (2004), “Can Absence Make a Team Grow Stronger?,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82, n°5, p. 181-187.
Malhotra A., Majchrzak A. (2009), “Communication context-dependent technology use in virtual teams”, ICIS proceedings.
Maruping, L.M., Agrawal, R. (2004), “Managing team interpersonal process through technology: a task- technology fit perspective”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, n°6, p. 975-990.
Massey, A.P., Montoya-Weiss, M.M. (2006), “Unravelling the Temporal Fabric of Knowledge Conversation: A Model of Media Selection and Use,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, n°1, p. 99-114.
Maznevski, M.L., Chudoba, K.M. (2000), “Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual team Dynamics and Effectiveness”, Organization Science, Vol. 11, n°5, p. 473-492.
Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., Kramer, M. R. (1996), “Swift Trust and Temporary Groups”, in M.R. Kramer and T. R. Tyler, Trust in Organisations, Frontiers of Theory and Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, p. 166-195.
Mihhailova, G. (2007), “Virtual works and its challenges and types,” The Business Review Cambridge, Vol. 12, n°2, p. 96-103.
Montoya-Weiss, M.M., Massey, M.P., Song, M. (2001), “Getting it together : Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24, n°6, p. 1251-1262.
Mortensen, M. Hinds, P.J. (2001), “Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams”, International Journal conflict management, Vol. 12, n° 3, p. 212-238.
O’Leary, M. B., Cummings, J. N. (2007), “The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, n°3, p.433-452.
O’Leary, M. B. Mortensen. M. (2010), "Go (Con)figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams." Organizational Science, Vol. 21, n°1, p.115-31.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000), “Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science, Vol. 11, n°4, p. 404-428.
Parot, I. (2003), “Vers une typologie des équipes à distance”, 8ème colloque de l’AIM, 21-23 mai, Grenoble, France.
Paul, S., Sheetharaman, P., Samarah, I., Mykytyn, P.P. (2004), “Impact of Heterogeneity and Collaborative Conflict Management Style on the Performance of Synchronous Global Virtual Teams”, Information & Management, Vol. 41, p. 303-321.
Piccoli, G., Powell, A., Ives, B. (2004), “Virtual Teams: Team Control Structure, Work Processes, and Team Effectiveness,” Information Technology & People, Vol. 17, p. 356-379.
Potter, R.E., Balthazard, P.A. (2002), “Understanding Human Interaction and Performance in the Virtual Teams,” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, Vol. 4, n°1, p.1-23.
Schweitzer L. and Duxbury L. (2010), “Conceptualizing and measuring the virtuality of teams”, Information Systems Journal. A venir
Skyes, T.A., Venkatesh, V., Gosain, S. (2009), “Model of acceptance with peer-support: A social network perspective to understand employees’ system use”, MIS quarterly, Vol. 33, n°2, p. 371-393.
Staples, S .B., Webster, J., (2008), “Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence, and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 617-640.
Thomas, D.M., Bostrom, R.P.,(2010), “Vital signs for virtual teams: an empirically developed trigger model for technology adaptation interventions”, MIS quarterly, Vol 34, n°1, pp. 115-142.
Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., Hendrickson, A.R. (1998), “Virtual Teams: Technology and the Workplace of the Future,” Academy of Management Executive, Vol.12, n°3, p. 17-29.
Walter, J.B. (1995), “Relationship Aspects of Computer-mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time”, Organization Science, Vol. 6, n°2, p. 186-203.
Warkentin, M., Syeed, L., Hightower, R. (1997), “Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams an exploratory study of web-based conference systems”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 28, n°4.
Watson-Manheim, M.B., Bélanger, F. (2007), “Communication Repertoires: Dealing with the Multiplicity of Media Choices,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, n°2, p.267-293.
Zack, H.M. (1993), “Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 4, n°2, p. 207- 239.
Zack, M. H. (1994), “Electronic Messaging and Communication Effectiveness in an Ongoing Work Group,” Information & Management, Vol. 26, p. 231-241.
Zack, M. H., Mckenney, J. L. (1995), “Social Context and Interaction in Ongoing Computer Supported Management,” Organization Science, Vol. 6, n°4, p. 394- 422.
Zigurs, I. (2003), “Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 31, n°4, p. 339-351.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.
It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:
- ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
- it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.
In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:
- The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
- The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).
