A COMBINED VARIANCE AND PROCESS PERSPECTIVE ON IT CULTURE AND IT USAGE LEADING TO THE CONCEPT OF IT ACCULTURATION
Keywords:Expectable use, Effective use, IT acculturation, IT culture, IT needs, IT usage
We adopt a mixed-design grounded-theory approach to investigate the relationships between IT culture and different facets of IT usage – effective use and expectable use – as well as the emergence and increasing level of IT needs perceived by users in their everyday life. We use cross-sectional quantitative data from 666 respondents, which we analyze from a variance perspective. We also use longitudinal qualitative data from six individual case studies, which we analyze from a process perspective. Combining the two perspectives, we highlight and explain some causal loops between constructs and a process that we name ‘IT acculturation’. Our contributions are theoretical and methodological. Our results help enrich the understanding of IT usage and how its evolution may be supported through the monitoring and nurturing of users’ IT acculturation.
Abubakre, M., Ravishankar, M., and Coombs, C. (2017) Revisiting the trajectory of IT implementation in organisations: an IT culture perspective. Information Technology and People, Vol. 30, n°3, p. 562-579.
Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality. London: Verso.
Baker, S., and Thomas, J. (2007) Agile Principles as a Leadership Value System: How Agile Memes Survive and Thrive in a Corporate IT Culture. Agile 2007, IEEE, 415-420.
Beaudry, A., and Pinsonneault, A. (2005) Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation”. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, n°3, p. 493-524.
Berry, J. (1980) Acculturation as Varieties of Adaptation. In A. M. Padilla (Ed.), Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings (9–25). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Bi, X., and Yu, C. (2008) Absorptive Capacity of Information Technology and Its Conceptual Model. Tsinghua Science and Technology, Vol. 13, n°3, p. 337-343.
Bookhamer, P., and Zhang, Z. J. (2016) Knowledge Management in a Global Context: A Case Study. Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 29, n°1, p. 57-74.
Brown, S.A., Massey A. P., Montoya-Weiss M.M. and Burkman J. R. (2002) Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 11, n°4, p. 283–295.
Burton-Jones, A., and Gallivan, M. (2007) M. Toward a Deeper Understanding of System Usage in Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, n°4, p. 657-679.
Burton-Jones, A., AND Grange, C. (2012) From use to effective use: a representation theory perspective. Information Systems Research, Vol. 24, n°3, p. 632-658.
Burton-Jones, A., McLean, E. R., and Monod, E. (2015) Theoretical perspectives in IS research: from variance and process to conceptual latitude and conceptual fit. European journal of information systems, Vol. 24, n°6, p. 664-679.
Burton-Jones A. and Straub D.W. (2006) Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test. Information Systems Research, Vol. 17, n°3, p. 228–246.
Carr, N. (2003) IT Doesn’t Matter. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 81(5) p. 45-49.
Carter, M. and Grover, V. (2015) Me, my self, and I (T): conceptualizing information technology identity and its implications. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 39, n°4, p. 931-958.
Chao, G. T. (2000) Multilevel issues and culture: An integrative view. In K. J. Klein and S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions, 308-346. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Chase, N. (2008) An Exploration of the Culture of Information Technology: Focus on Unrelenting Change. Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Organizations. Vol. 3, p. 135-150.
Chin, W. W. (1998) The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling, in Modern Methods for Business Research, G. A. Marcoulides (ed.), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, p. 295-358.
Chin, W. W. (2010) How to Write Up and Repor t PLS Analyses, in Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications in Marketing and Related Fields, V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang (eds.), Berlin: Springer p. 655-690.
Chirkov, V. (2009) Critical psychology of acculturation: What do we study and how do we study it, when we investigate acculturation? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 33, p. 94-105.
Cooper, S. (2002) Technoculture and Critical Theory. Routledge. Taylor and Francis Group.
Davidson, E. (2011) 'Hey professor, why are you teaching this class?’ Reflections on the relevance of IS research for undergraduate students. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 20, p. 133-138.
Dawkins, R. (1989) The selfish gene. Oxford University press. Oxford.
Deci E., and Ryan, R. (2008) “Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains”. Canadian Psychology, Vol. 49, p. 14-23.
Devaraj, S. and Kohli, R. (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link? Management Science, Vol. 49, n°3, p. 273–289.
Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C., and Straub, D.W. (2011) Opening the black box of system usage: user adaptation to disruptive IT. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 20, p. 589-607.
Finkel, S. E. (1995) Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Forehand, G., and Von Haller G. (1964) Environmental variation in studies of organizational behavior.” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 62, n°6, p. 361-382.
Fornell C. and Cha J. (1994) Advanced Methods of Marketing Research, Blackwell Business, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981) Evaluation Structural Equation Models with Unobsevable Variables and Measurement Errors. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, p. 39-50.
Gallivan, M., and Srite., M. (2005) Information technology and culture: Identifying fragmentary and holistic perspectives of culture. Information and Organization, Vol. 15, p. 295-338.
Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., and Straub, D. W. (2011) Editors Comment: An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, n°2, p. iii-xiv.
Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., and Boudreau, M.-C. (2000) Structural Equation Modeling Techniques and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of the AIS, Vol. 1, n°7, p. 1-78.
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A., (1967) The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, Aldine.
Glaser, B. G. (2007) Doing formal grounded theory: A proposal. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (2003) The Grounded Theory Perspective II: Description’s remodeling of grounded theory methodology. Sociology Press, Mill Valley CA.
Glaser, B. G. (2008) Qualitative and Quantitative Research. The Grounded Theory Review, Vol. 7, n°2, p. 1-17.
Glaser, B. G. (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Guzman, I., Stam, K., and Stanton, J. (2008) The Occupational Culture of IS/IT Personnel within Organizations”. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems. Vol. 39, n°1, p. 33-50.
Guzman, I., and Stanton, J. (2008) Women's Adaptation to the IT-culture. Women's Studies: Special Issue on Women and Technology: Reversing the Trends of Attrition and Obtaining a Balance Vol. 37(3), p. 202-228.
Guzman, I., and Stanton, J. (2009) IT occupational culture: the cultural fit and commitment of new information technologists. Information Technology and People, Vol. 22, n°2, p. 157-187.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., and Mena, J. A. (2012) An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 40, n°3, p. 414–433.
Hanseth, O., and Bygstad, B. (2015) Flexible generification: ICT standardization strategies and service innovation in health care. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 24, n°6, p. 645-663.
Hartwick, J. and Barki, H. (1994) Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science. Vol. 40, n°4, p. 440–465.
Hofstede, G. J. (2001). Adoption of communication technologies and national culture. Systèmes d’Information et Management, Vol. 6, n°3, p. 55-74.
Holton, J.A. (2008) Grounded Theory as a General Research Methodology. The Grounded Theory Review. 7, n°2, p. 67-93.
Holton, J. A., and Walsh, I. (2016) Classic grounded theory: applications with qualitative and quantitative data. SAGE Publications.
James, L., and Jones, A. (1974) Organizational climate: A review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 81, n°12, p. 1096-1112.
Johnson, R. and Walsh, I. (2019) Mixed Grounded Theory: Merging Grounded Theory with Mixed Methods and Multimethod Research in Bryant, A., and Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2019) in The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications Limited, p. 517-531.
Jouët, J. (1993) Pratiques de communication et figures de la médiation, Réseaux. Vol. 60, p. 99-12.
Jouët, J. (2000) Retour critique sur la sociologie des usages. Réseaux. Vol. 100, p. 498-521.
Kaarst-Brown, M. L. (2017) Once upon a time: Crafting allegories to analyze and share the cultural complexity of strategic alignment. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 26, n°3, p. 298-314.
Kaarst- Brown, M. (2004) How Organizations Keep Information Technology Out: The Interaction of Tri-Level Influences on Organizational and IT-culture, Working Paper IST-MLKB: 2004-2, School of Information Studies, Syracuse University.
Kaarst-Brown, M., and Guzman, I. (2010) A Cultural Perspective on Individual Choices of STEM Education and Subsequent Occupations. SIGMIS-CPR’10, May 20–22, 2010, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kaarst-Brown, M., and Robey, D. (1999) More on myth, magic and metaphor: Cultural insights into the management of information technology in organizations. Information Technology and People Vol. 12, n°2, p. 192-217.
Kappos, A., and Rivard, S. (2008) A Three-Perspective Model of Culture, Information Systems, and Their Development and Use. MIS Quarterly Vol. 32, n°3, p. 601-634.
Kim, B. S. K., & Abreu, J. M. (2001). Acculturation measurement: Theory, current instruments, and future directions. In J. G. Ponterotto, J. M. Casas, L. A. Suzuki, & C. M. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (p. 394–424). Sage Publications, Inc.
Klein, J., and Kozlowski, S., (2000) Multilevel Theory. Research and Methods in organizations : Foundations, Extensions and New Directions. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Company. San Francisco.
Kline, R.B. (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd edition. The Guilford Press. New York.
Koch, H., Leidner, D. E., and Gonzalez, E. S. (2013) Digitally enabling social networks: resolving IT–culture conflict. Information Systems Journal, Vol. 23, n°6, p. 501-523.
Kohli, R., and Melville, N. (2009) Learning to Build an IT Innovation Platform. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 52, n°8, p. 122-126.
Leidner, D. (2010) Globalization, culture, and information: Towards global knowledge transparency. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 19, p. 69-77.
Leidner, D., and Kayworth, T. (2006) A review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, n°2, p. 357-399.
Levina, N., and Orlikowski, W. J. (2009) Understanding shifting power relations within and across organizations: A critical genre analysis. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 52, n°4, p. 672-703.
Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989) Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares, Heidelberg: Physica.
Loch K., Straub D. W., and Kamel S. (2003) Diffusing the Internet in the Arab World: the Role of Social Norms and Technological Culturation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 50, n°1.
Maddi, S. (1989) Personality theories: A comparative analysis (5th ed). California: Brooks/Cole.
Martens, M. P., and Haase, R. F. (2006) Advanced applications of structural equation modeling in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 34, n°6, p. 878-911.
Martin, J. (2002) Organizational Culture: Mapping the Terrain. Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks. London. New Delhi.
Martin, J. (1992) Cultures in organizations, three perspectives. Oxford University Press. New York, Oxford.
McElroy, J., Hendrickson, A., Townsend, A. and Demarie, S. (2007) Dispositional Factors In Internet Use: personality Versus Cognitive Style. MIS Quartely, Vol. 31, n°4, p. 809-820.
Meissonier, R., and Houzé, E. (2007) The IT culture as an obstacle to the adoption of an ERP: Case of a high-tech SME. Advances in information systems development : new methods and practice for the networked society, Vol. 1, p. 279-293.
Meyerson, D. and Martin, J. (1987) Cultural change: An integration of three different views . Journal of management studies, Vol. 24, n°6, p. 623-647.
Millerand, F., Giroux, F., Proulx, S. (2001) La ‘culture technique’ dans l’appropriation cognitive des TIC. Une étude des usages du courrier électronique. Actes du colloque international ICUST, Paris (France), p. 400-410.
Nord, J.H., Nord, G.D., Cormack, S. and Cater-Steel, A. (2007) An Investigation of the Effect of Information Technology (IT) Culture on the Relationship between IT and Business Professionals. Int. J. Management and Enterprise Development. Vol. 4, n°3, p. 265 - 292.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978) Psychometric Theory. McGraw Hill, New York (NY).
Orlikowski, W., and Scott, S. (2008) Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization. The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 2, n°1, p. 433-474.
Pascal, A., Aldebert, B., & Rouziès, A. (2018). Les méthodes mixtes en systèmes d’information: enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques. Systemes d'Information et Management, Vol. 23, n°3, p. 99-126.
Patton, M. (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Podsakoff, P., Mackensie, S., Jeong-Yeon, L., and Podsakoff, N. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, n°5, p. 879.
Prensky, M. (2001) Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon. NCB University Press, Vol. 9, n°5, p. 1-6.
Prensky, M., (2009) H. sapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate, Vol. 5, p. 3, http://innovateonline.info/
Prensky, M. (2012) From digital natives to digital wisdom: Hopeful essays for 21st century learning. Corwin Press.
Ringle, M., Sarstedt, M., and Straub, D. W. (2012) A Critical Look at the Use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36, n°1, p. iii-xiv.
Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., and Will, S. (2005) SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta, http://www.smartpls.de.
Robins, K. and Webster, F. (1999) Times of the Technoculture. Routledge. Taylor and Francis Group
Rokeach, M. (1973) The Nature of Human Values. The Free Press. Macmillan. New York.
Rudmin, F. (2009) “Constructs, measurements and models of acculturation and acculturative stress”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 33, p. 106-123.
Serres, A. (2007) « Questions autour de la culture informationnelle » "The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, La Revue canadienne des sciences de l’information et de bibliothéconomie Vol. 31, n°1, p. 69-85.
de Sousa, C., and Hendriks, P. 2006. The Diving Bell and the Butterfly: The Need for Grounded Theory in Developing a Knowledge-Based View of Organizations. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 9, n°3, p. 315-338.
Standish Group (2015) Chaos Report: https://www.infoq.com/articles/standish-chaos-2015
Straub, D.W., Loch K., Evaristo, R., Karahanna, E., and Srite, M. (2002) Toward a theory-based measurement of culture. Journal of Global Information Management, Vol. 10, n°1, p. 13-23.
Suddaby, R. (2006) What grounded theory is not. Academy of management journal, Vol. 49, n°4, p. 633-642.
Tarrow, S. (1995) Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide in Political Science. American Political Science Review, Vol. 89, n°2, p. 471-474.
Te’eni, D. (2017) Digital natives and immigrant editors, and special issues. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 26, n°3, p. 237-239
Thomson, M. and Hoffman-Goetz, L. (2009) Deﬁning and measuring acculturation: A systematic review of public health studies with Hispanic populations in the United States. Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 69, n°7, p. 983-991.
Turkle, S. (2011) Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books, New York.
Urwiller, R., and Frolick, M. (2008) The IT Value Hierarchy: Using Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs as a Metaphor for Gauging the Maturity Level of Information technology Use within Competitive Organizations”. Information Systems Management. Vol. 25, p. 83-88.
Utesheva, A., Simpson, J. R., and Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2016). Identity metamorphoses in digital disruption: a relational theory of identity. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 25, n°4, p. 344-363.
Vallerand, R. (2007) Les fondements de la psychologie sociale. Ed. Gaëtan Morin.
Vallerand, R. (2001) Deci and Ryan’s Self- Determination Theory: A View From the Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Laboratoire de Recherche sur le Comportement Social. Université du Québec à Montréal, p. 312–318.
Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., and Kestner, R. (2008) Reflections on Self-Determination Theory. The Canadian Psychological Association, Vol. 49, n°3, p. 257–262;
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., and Bala, H. (2013) Bridging the qualitative quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods in information systems. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 37, n°1, p. 21–54.
Venkatesh, V., Thong,J., and Xu, X. (2012) Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS quarterly, Vol. 36, n°1, p. 157-178.
Vinzi, V. E., Trinchera, L., and Amato, S. (2010) PLS Path Modeling: From Foundation to Recent Developments and Open Issues Form Model Assessment and Improvement. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares, p. 47-82. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Von Stetten, A., Wild, U., and Chrennikow, W. (2011) Adopting Social Network Sites – The Role of Individual IT Culture and Privacy Concerns. AMCIS Proceedings.
Walsh, I. (2015) Using quantitative data in mixed-design grounded theory studies: an enhanced path to formal grounded theory in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 24, n°5, p. 531-557.
Walsh, I. (2014) A strategic path to study IT use through users’ IT culture and IT needs: a mixed-method grounded theory. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 23, n°2, p. 146-173.
Walsh, I. (2009) Development of an Instrument to Assess Individual IT-Culture. 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems. AMCIS Proceedings.
Walsh I, Gettler-Summa M., Kalika M. (2016) Expectable use: An important facet of IT usage. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. Vol. 25, n°3, p. 177-210.
Walsh, I., Holton, J. A., Bailyn, L., Fernandez, W., Levina, N., & Glaser, B. (2015). What grounded theory is… a critically reflective conversation among scholars. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 18, n°4, p. 581-599.
Walsh, I. and Kefi H. (2008) The Spinning Top Model, a new Path to conceptualize Culture and Values: applications to IS research. ICIS proceedings, Paris, France.
Walsh, I., Kefi, H., and Baskerville, R. (2010) Managing Culture Creep: Toward a Strategic Model of User IT Culture. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 19, n°4, p. 257-280.
Wijeyawardena, K., Wijewardena, N., Samartunge, R. (2017) Compromising gender identities: Stay strategies of women in gender-atypical information technology firms in Sri Lanka. Information Technology and People, Vol. 30, n°2, p. 246-264.
Weber, M. (1968) On charisma and institution building. The University of Chicago Press.
White, D., and Le Cornu, A. (2011) Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday. Vol. 16(9), http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3171.
Wong, K., and Law, C. (1999) Testing Reciprocal Relations by Nonrecursive Structural Equation Models Using Cross-Sectional Data. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 2, n°1, p. 69-87.
Ye, L. R. and Johnson, P. E. (1995) The impact of explanation facilities on user acceptance of expert systems advice. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, n°2, p. 157-172.
The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.
It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:
- ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
- it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.
In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:
- The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
- The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).