Explanatory models of technical debt production in Agile and DevOps contexts: A review of the literature using the BIBGT method
Abstract
At a time of unprecedented acceleration in digital transformation, digital businesses are still seeking agility to keep pace with market developments and ensure their growth. However, this exponential acceleration must not be achieved at the expense of certain risks linked to the accumulation of technical debt, in order to ensure the sustainability of these strategies.
The aim of this study is to build, from existing literature, explanatory models of the technical debt phenomenon in Agile and DevOps development contexts. We analyze the impact of the practices mobilized in these development contexts on the production of technical debt, and identify the inertial constraints that hinder its proper management. To do this, we carried out a literature review using the inductive BIBGT method, based on a combination of advanced bibliometric techniques and Grounded Theory. Through this literature review, we identified the different schools of thought, the different themes on the research front and the main avenues of research that would enable us to improve our understanding of the phenomenon of technical debt. Our analysis shows that, technically, Agile and DevOps practices should reduce the level of technical debt and optimize overall software quality. However, certain practices implemented in these contexts can lead to the production of debt. Furthermore, our results show that organizational inertia allows us to theorize both the production and mismanagement of technical debt.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.
It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:
- ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
- it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.
In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:
- The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
- The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).