Unpacking Big tech power: A developmental literature review of IS research

Authors

  • Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte CNRS, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueLEM (Lille Economie Management, UMR CNRS 9221), IESEG, U.Lille
  • Emmanuel Bertin Orange Labs, Caen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66450/sim.v30i3.01

Keywords:

Big Tech, digital platforms, Power, Literature Review, Big Tech power, Information Technology

Abstract

Society is now profoundly shaped by digital platforms such as Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Google/Alphabet, Facebook/Meta, and X. Although these “Big Tech” firms exert pervasive influence across all spheres of life, their growing power remains insufficiently theorized and critically debated within information systems (IS) research. This article systematically reviews the IS literature to examine how the concept of digital platform power has been constructed. We find that current IS research addresses Big Tech power through four interconnected themes: (1) technological power, (2) economic power, (3) societal power, and (4) associated threats and risks. Our findings highlight a fragmented literature, dominated by instrumental views and business priorities, with insufficient critical problematization. We contend that “Big Tech power” represents a missing and necessary construct within IS scholarship; accordingly, this article seeks to conceptualize its foundations and mechanisms. We advocate for the adoption of a more integrative and responsible research agenda in IS, enabling scholars and practitioners to better understand, evaluate, and shape the future governance of digital platforms—ultimately contributing to a more responsible and desirable digital society.

References

Agarwal, R., & Dhar, V. (2014). Editorial—Big data, data science, and analytics: The opportunity and challenge for IS. Information Systems Research, 25(3), 443-448.*

Ahuja, S., Chan, Y. E., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2023). Responsible innovation with digital platforms: Cases in India and Canada. Information Systems Journal, 33(1), 76–129.*

Alaimo, C., Kallinikos, J., & Valderrama, E. (2020). Platforms as service ecosystems: Lessons from social media. Journal of Information Technology, 35(1), 25-48.*

Bar-Gill, S. (2019). Game of platforms: Strategic expansion into rival (online) territory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(10), 1475-1502.*

Baskerville, R. L., Myers, M. D., & Yoo, Y. (2020). Digital first: The ontological reversal and new challenges for information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 44(2), 509-523.*

Beard, A. (2022). Can big tech be disrupted? A conversation with Columbia Business School professor Jonathan Knee. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/01/can-big-tech-be-disrupted.

Beauvisage, T., & Mellet, K. (2020). Datassets: Assetizing and marketizing personal data. In K. Birch & F. Muniesa (Eds.), Assetization: Turning things into assets in technoscientific capitalism (pp. 75–95). MIT Press.

Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011). Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 1017–1041.*

Bélanger, F., & Xu, H. (2015). The role of information systems research in shaping the future of information privacy. Information Systems Journal, 25, 573–578.*

Benbya, H., Nan, N., Tanriverdi, H., & Yoo, Y, (2020). Complexity and information systems research in the emerging digital world. MIS Quarterly, 44(1), 1-17.*

Birch, K., & Bronson, K. (2022). Big tech. Science as Culture, 31(1), 1-14.

Birch, K., Cochrane, D. T., & Ward, C. (2021). Data as asset? The measurement, governance, and valuation of digital personal data by Big Tech. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 1–15.

Bonina, C., Koskinen, K., Eaton, B., & Gawer, A. (2021). Digital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda. Information Systems Journal, 31(6), 869-902.

Böttcher, T. P., Empelmann, S., Weking, J., Hein, A., & Krcmar, H. (2024). Digital sustainable business models: Using digital technology to integrate ecological sustainability into the core of business models. Information Systems Journal, 34(3), 736–761*

Brancaccio, D., & Schroeder, A. (2023). Forget the U.S. and China—Big Tech is the next world power, Marketplace Morning Report, https://www.marketplace.org/2023/06/20/forget-the-u-s-and-china-big-tech-is-the-next-world-power/.

Bremmer, I. (2023). The next global superpower isn't who you think. https://www.ted.com/talks/ian_bremmer_the_next_global_superpower_isn_t_who_you_think.

Brynjolfsson, E., & Saunders, A. (2009). Wired for innovation: How information technology is reshaping the economy. MIT Press.

Busch, C., Graef, I., Hofmann, J., & Gawer, A. (2021). Uncovering blindspots in the policy debate on platform power: Final report. European Commission.

Butler, T., Gozman, D., & Lyytinen, K. (2023). The regulation of and through information technology: Towards a conceptual ontology for IS research. Journal of Information Technology, 38(2), 86-107.*

Cameron, L., Lamers, L., Leicht-Deobald, U., Lutz, C., Meijerink, J., & Möhlmann, M. (2023). Algorithmic management: Its implications for information systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 52, 518-537.*

Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2019). The resistible rise of the digital surveillance economy: A call for action. Journal of Information Technology, 34(1), 81-83. *

Chen, A., Lu, Y., Chau, P. Y. K., & Gupta, S. (2014). Classifying, measuring, and predicting users’ overall active behavior on social networking sites. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(3), 213-253.*

Ciriello, R. F. (2025), Dear Schopenhauer: How can IS Artefacts Help Us Flourish? Wille, vorstellung, compassion, and beauty in Social Media, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 37, 1, Article 9.

Ciriello, R., Gal, U., Hannon, O., & Thatcher, J. (2024). Responsible social media use: how user characteristics shape the actualisation of ambiguous affordances. European Journal of Information Systems, 34(5), 799–821.*

Ciriello, R. F., Mathiassen, L., Risius, M., Cheong, M., Scheepers, H., & Vaast, E. (2025). Compassionate Digital Innovation: A Pluralistic Perspective and Research Agenda. Information Systems Journal, 1–22, forthcoming.*

Clarke, R. (2016). Big data, big risks. Information Systems Journal, 26, 77–90.*

Clarke, R. (2019). Risks inherent in the digital surveillance economy: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 34(1), 59-80.*

Clarke, R. (2022). Research opportunities in the regulatory aspects of electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 32(1), 179–200.

Claussen, J., Kretschmer, T., & Mayrhofer, P. (2013). The effects of rewarding user engagement: The case of Facebook apps. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 186-200.*

Clemons, E., & Madhani, N. (2010). Regulation of digital businesses with natural monopolies or third-party payment business models: Antitrust lessons from the analysis of Google. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(3), 43-80.*

Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G. (2018). Introduction—Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 381-400.*

Constantiou, I. D., & Kallinikos, J. (2014). New games, new rules: Big data and the changing context of strategy. Journal of Information Technology, 21(2), 125–153. *

Culnan, M. J. (2019). Policy to avoid a privacy disaster. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(6), 848-856. *

de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124–135. *

de Vaujany F. X., Leclercq-Vandelannoitte A., Aroles J., Introna L., & Davidson S., (2025). Rethinking responsibility in the digital age: A narrative approach. MIS Quarterly, forthcoming.

Demetis, D., & Lee, A. S. (2018). When humans using the IT artifact becomes IT using the human artifact. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(10), 929-952.*

Deng, X., Joshi, K. D., & Galliers, R. D. (2016). The duality of empowerment and marginalization in microtask crowdsourcing: Giving voice to the less powerful through value sensitive design. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 279–302.*

Dinev, T. (2014). Why would we care about privacy? European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 97–102.*

Ding, C., Cheng, H. K., Duan, Y., & Jin, Y. (2017). The power of the “like” button: The impact of social media on box office, Decision Support Systems, 94, 77-84. *

Doctorow, C. (2020). How to destroy surveillance capitalism. Medium Editions, https://onezero.medium.com/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism-8135e6744d59.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E.L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. *

Edwards, L. (2018). Data protection: Enter the general data protection regulation. In L. Edwards (Ed.), Law, policy and the internet (pp. 77–117). Hart.

Ens, N., Hukal, P., & Blegind Jensen, T. (2023). Dynamics of control on digital platforms. Information Systems Journal, 33(4), 890–911;*

Fast, V., Schnurr, D., & Wohlfarth, M. (2023). Regulation of data-driven market power in the digital economy: Business value creation and competitive advantages from big data. Journal of Information Technology, 38(2), Article 7.*

Flyverbom, M., Deibert, R., & Matten, D. (2019). The governance of digital technology, big data, and the internet: New roles and responsibilities for business. Business & Society, 58(1), 3–19.

Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.

Franck, J. U., & Peitz, M. (2019). Market definition and market power in the platform economy. Report, Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE).

Galliers, R. D., Newell, S., Shanks, G., & and Topi, H. (2017). Datification and its human, organizational and societal effects: The strategic opportunities and challenges of algorithmic decision-making. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(3), 185-190. *

Gal-Or, E., Gal-Or, R., & Penmetsa, N. (2018). The role of user privacy concerns in shaping competition among platforms. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 698-722.*

Gawer, A., & Bonina, C. (2024). Digital platforms and development: Risks to competition and their regulatory implications in developing countries. Information and Organization, 34(3), 100525.*

Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2015). A Paradigmatic Analysis of Digital Application Marketplaces. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 198-208.*

Gleiss, A., Degen, K., & Pousttchi, K. (2023). Identifying the patterns: Towards a systematic approach to digital platform regulation. Journal of Information Technology, 38(2), Article 6.*

Goes, P. (2014). Editor's comments: Big data and IS research. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), iii-viii.*

Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 854–871.

Granados, N., Gupta, A., & Kauffman, R. J. (2010). Research commentary—Information transparency in business-to-consumer markets: Concepts, framework, and research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 207–226.*

Greene, T., Shmueli, G., & Ray, S. (2023). Taking the Person Seriously: Ethically Aware IS Research in the Era of Reinforcement Learning-based Personalization. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 24(6), 1527-1561. Article 6.

Grimshaw, M. (2018). Towards a manifesto for a critical digital humanities: Critiquing the extractive capitalism of digital society. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1-8.

Grover, V., Chiang, R., Liang, T., & Zhang, D. (2018). Creating strategic business value from big data analytics: A research framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 388-423.*

Han, W., Wang, X., Ahsen, M. E., & Wattal, S. (2022), The societal impact of sharing economy platform self-regulations—An empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 33(4), 1303-1323*

Hassan, N. R. (2017). Editorial: The history and philosophy department. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 41, 319-333.*

Hawley, J. (2021). The tyranny of Big Tech. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Heimbach, I., & Hinz, O. (2018). The impact of sharing mechanism design on content sharing in online social networks. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 592-611.*

Hein, R. (2022). Does big tech have too much power? https://www.cmswire.com/digital-experience/does-big-tech-have-too-much-power/. CMSWire. Accessed August 15, 2022.

Henfridsson, O., Nandhakumar, J., Scarbrough, H., & Panourgias, N. (2018). Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation. Information and Organization, 28(2), 89–100. *

Hillebrand, K., Hornuf, L., Müller, B., & Vrankar, D., (2023). The social dilemma of big data: Donating personal data to promote social welfare. Information and Organization, 33(1), 100452.*

Hillmann, J., & Guenther, E. (2021). Organizational resilience: A valuable construct for management research? International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1), 7-44.

Hinz, O., van der Aalst, W. M., & Weinhardt, C. (2020). Research in the Attention Economy. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62(2), 83-85.

Hovorka, D., & Peter, S. (2021). Speculatively engaging future(s): Four theses. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 461–466.*

Hu, Y., Xu, A., Hong, Y., Gal, D., Sinha, V., & Akkiraju, R. (2019). Generating business intelligence through social media analytics: Measuring brand personality with consumer-, employee-, and firm-generated content. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(3), 893-930.*

Hurni, T., Huber, T. L., & Dibbern, J. (2022). Power dynamics in software platform ecosystems. Information Systems Journal, 32(2), 310–343.*

Jabr, W. (2021). Review credibility as a safeguard against fakery: The case of Amazon. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(4), 525-545. *

Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 2255–2276.

James, T., Lowry, P. B, Wallace, L., & Warkentin, M. (2017). The effect of belongingness on obsessive-compulsive disorder in the use of online social networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(2), 560-596.*

Jasperson, J. S., Carte, T. A., Saunders, C. S., Butler, B. S., Croes H. J., & Zheng, W. (2002). Power and information technology research: A metatriangulation review. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 397-459. *

Jia, Y., Liu, L., & Lowry, P. B. (2024). How do consumers make behavioural decisions on social commerce platforms? The interaction effect between behaviour visibility and social needs. Information Systems Journal, 34(5), 1703–1736*

Jiang, L., Wagner, C., & Chen, X. (2021). Taking time into account: understanding microworkers’ continued participation in microtasks. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(4), 893–930.*

Johnson, S., Gray, P. & Sarker, S. (2019). Revisiting IS research practice in the era of big data. Information and Organization. 29, 41-56.*

Kane, G., Young, A., Majchrzak, A., & Ransbotham, S. (2021). Avoiding an oppressive future of machine learning: A design theory for emancipatory assistants. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 371–396.*

Karhu, K., Gustafsson, R., Eaton, B. D., Henfridsson, O., & Sørensen, C. (2020). Four tactics for implementing a balanced digital platform strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(2), Article 4.*

Karhu, K., Gustafsson, R., & Lyytinen, K. (2018). Exploiting and defending open digital platforms with boundary resources: Android’s five platform forks. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 479–497.*

Kim, A., Lahiri, A., & Dey, D. (2018). The “invisible hand” of piracy: An economic analysis of the information-goods supply chain. MIS Quarterly, 42(4), 1117–1141.*

Kitchens, B., Johnson, S. L., & Gray, P. (2020). Understanding echo chambers and filter bubbles: The impact of social media on diversification and partisan shifts in news consumption. MIS Quarterly, 44(4), 1619–1649.*

Kokshagina, O., Reinecke, P. C., & Karanasios, S. (2023). To regulate or not to regulate: Unravelling institutional tussles around the regulation of algorithmic control of digital platforms. Journal of Information Technology, 38(2), 160-179.*

Kölbel, T., Kunz, D., & Lamberty, R. (2023). Dark sides of the platform economy: Market power and its abuse by platform orchestrators. ECIS 2023 Research Paper 274.*

Krämer, J., & Shekhar, S., (2025). Regulating digital platform ecosystems through data sharing and data siloing: Consequences for innovation and welfare. MIS Quarterly, 49(1), 123-154.*

Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., & Hildebrand, T. (2010). Online social networks: Why we disclose. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 109–125.*

Kunst, K., Ringberg, T., & Vatrapu, R. (2022). Beyond popularity: A user perspective on observable behaviours in a digital platform. Information Systems Journal, 32(3), 595–622.*

Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., (2021), The new paternalism? The workplace as a place to work—and to live, Organization, 28(6), 949–975.

Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., & Aroles, J. (2020). Does the end justify the means? Information systems and control society in the age of pandemics. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(6), 746-761.*

Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., & Bertin, E. (2024). How to deal with Big Tech power? The “Big Tech Raj”, a new form of biopower in the digital age. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 208, 123732.*

Lee, K., Lee, B., & Oh, W. (2015). Thumbs up, sales up? The contingent effect of Facebook likes on sales performance in social commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(4), 109-143.*

Leong, C., Pan, S. L., Leidner, D. E., & Huang, J. (2019). Platform leadership: Managing boundaries for the network growth of digital platforms. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(10), 1531-1565.*

Li, X., & Wu, L. (2018). Herding and social media word-of-mouth: Evidence from Groupon. MIS Quarterly, 42(4), 1331–1351.*

Lightfoot, G., & Wisniewski, T. P. (2014). Information asymmetry and power in a surveillance society. Information and Organization, 24(4), 214-235. *

Lin, S., & Armstrong, D. (2019). Beyond information: The role of territory in privacy management behavior on social networking sites. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(4), 434-475.*

Lindman, J., Makinen, J., & Kasanen, E. (2023). Big Tech’s power, political corporate social responsibility and regulation. Journal of Information Technology, 38(2), 144-159.*

Loebbecke, C., & Picot, A. (2015). Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: A research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(3), 149-157.*

Logue, D., Williamson, P., Roberts, A., Luo, Y., & Barrett, M. (2025). Digital innovation, platforms, and global strategy. Information and Organization, 35(1), 100562.*

Lycett, M. (2013). “Datafication”: Making sense of (big) data in a complex world. European Journal of Information Systems, 22, 381–386.*

Lyytinen, K., & Grover, V. (2017). Management misinformation systems: A time to revisit? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 18(3), 206-230.*

Maier, C., Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2015a). Giving too much social support: Social overload on social networking sites. European Journal of Information Systems, 24, 447–464.*

Maier, C., Laumer, S., Weinert, C., & Weitzel, T. (2015b). The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services: A study of Facebook use. Information Systems Journal, 25, 275–308.*

Majchrzak, A., Markus, M., & Wareham, J. (2016). Designing for digital transformation: Lessons for information systems research from the study of ICT and societal challenges. MIS Quarterly, 40, 267-277.*

March, S. T. (2019). Alexa, are you watching me? A response to Clarke, “Risks inherent in the digital surveillance economy: A research agenda.” Journal of Information Technology, 34(1), 87-92.*

Markus, M. (2015). New games, new rules, new scoreboards: the potential consequences of big data. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 58–59.*

Markus, M. L., & Saunders, C. (2006). Editor’s comments: Looking for a few good concepts and theories for the information systems field. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), iii–vi.*

Martin, K. E. (2015). Ethical issues in the big data industry. MIS Quarterly Executive, 14(2), Article 4.*

Matook, S., Brown, S. A., & Rolf, J. (2015). Forming an intention to act on recommendations given via online social networks. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(1), 76-92.*

Mikalef, P., Pateli, A., & van de Wetering, R. (2021). IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralisation as drivers of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities and competitive performance: The moderating effect of the external environment. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(5), 512–540.*

Mingers, J., & Willcocks, L. (2004). Social theory and philosophy for information systems. Wiley.

Moore, M., & Tambini, D. (Eds.) (2022). Regulating Big Tech: Policy responses to digital dominance. Oxford University Press.

Müller, O., Fay, M., & vom Brocke, J. (2018). The effect of big data and analytics on firm performance: An econometric analysis considering industry characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(2), 488–509.*

Newell, S., & Marabelli, M. (2015). Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making: A call for action on the long-term societal effects of “datification.” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(1), 3-14.*

Ngwenyama, O., Rowe, F., Klein, S., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2024). The open prison of the big data revolution: false consciousness, faustian bargains, and digital entrapment. Information Systems Research, 35(4), 2030-2058.*

Ngwenyama, O., Henriksen, H., & Hardt, D. (2023). Public management challenges in the digital risk society: A critical analysis of the public debate on implementation of the Danish NemID. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(2), 108-126.*

Nieborg, D., & Helmond, A. (2019). The political economy of Facebook’s platformization in the mobile ecosystem: Facebook messenger as a platform instance. Media, Culture & Society, 41(2), 196–218.

Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2010). Social networks and information systems: Ongoing and future research streams. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(2), 61-68.*

Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, Article 43.*

Ologeanu-Taddei, R. (2025). Values Behind the Code: Challenging Technological Neutrality in Information Systems Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 57, 653-671.*

Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. W. W. Norton.

Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Jiang, X. (2017). Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. MIS Quarterly, 41, 255-266.

Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society. Harvard University Press.

Pavlou, P. A. (2011). State of the information privacy literature: Where are we now and where should we go? MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 977–988.

Pérez, J., Murray, M., Fluker, J., Fluker, D., & Bailes, Z. (2017). Connectivity and continuity: New fronts in the platform war. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 40(8).

Rai, A., Constantinides, P., & Sarker, S. (2019). Editor’s comments: Next-generation digital platforms: Toward human–AI hybrids. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), iii-ix.*

Rivard, S. (2024). Unpacking the process of conceptual leaping in the conduct of literature reviews. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 33, 101822.*

Rowe, F. (2018). Being critical is good, but better with philosophy! From digital transformation and values to the future of MIS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3), 380-393.*

Rowe, F., & Markus, M. L. (2022). Taking the measure of digital giants: Amazon and the Social Welfare Computing research agenda. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 437-446.

Rowe, F., Ngwenyama, O., & Richet, J. L. (2020). Contact tracing apps and alienation in the age of Covid-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(5), 1–18.*

Safadi, H., & Watson, R. T. (2023). Knowledge monopolies and the innovation divide: A governance perspective. Information and Organization, 33(2), 100466.*

Sanner, T. A., Kempton, A. M., Russpatrick, S., & Sæbø, J. I. (2025). Governing digital platform ecosystems for social options. Information Systems Journal, 35(2), 422–449.*

Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., & Elbanna, A. (2019). The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: Its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 695–719.*

Shim, J., Avital, M., Dennis, A. R., Rossi, M., Sørensen, C., & French, A. (2019). The transformative effect of the internet of things on business and society. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44, 129-140.*

Someh, I., Davern, M., Breidbach, C. F., & Shanks, G. (2019). Ethical issues in big data analytics: a stakeholder perspective. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44, 34.*

Swant, M. (2020, July 27). The 2020 World's Most Valuable Brands. Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/the-worlds-most-valuable-brands/#606b3233119c.

Tan, B., Pan, S., Lu, X., & Lihua, H. (2015). The role of IS capabilities in the development of multi-sided platforms: The digital ecosystem strategy of Alibaba.com. Journal of the Association of Information Systems,16, 248-280.*

Tan, B., Xiao, X., Chau, M., Tan, F.T.C. and Leong, C. (2025), The dynamics, organisation and evolution of digital platforms and ecosystems. Information Systems Journal, 35, 417-421.*

Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2015). A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37*

Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2018). Transparency in literature reviews: An assessment of reporting practices across review types and genres in top IS journals. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(5), 503–550.*

Teubner, T., & Flath, C. M. (2019). Privacy in the sharing economy. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(3), 213-242.*

Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Research commentary—Digital infrastructures: the missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748-759.*

Tiwana, A. (2015). Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Information Systems Research, 26(2), 266-281.*

Turel, O., & Qahri-Saremi, H. (2024). Role of “Likes” and “Dislikes” in Influencing User Behaviors on Social Media. Journal of Management Information Systems, 41(2), 515–545.*

Turel, O., & Serenko, A. (2012). The benefits and dangers of enjoyment with social networking websites. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 512–528.*

Van Alstyne, M. W., Petropoulos, G., Parker, G., & Martens, B. (2021). “In situ” data rights. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 34–35.

Walsham, G. (2012). Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field. Journal of Information Technology, 27(2), 87-93.*

Whitley, E., Gal, U., & Kjaergaard, A. (2014). Who do you think you are? A review of the complex interplay between information systems, identification and identity. European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 17–35.*

Wiener, M., Saunders, C., & Marabelli, M. (2020). Big-data business models: A critical literature review and multiperspective research framework. Journal of Information Technology, 35(1), 66-91.*

Woerner, S. L., & Wixom, B. H. (2015). Big data: Extending the business strategy toolbox. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 60-62.*

Xu, H., & Bélanger, F. (2013). Information Systems Journal Special Issue on: Reframing Privacy in a Networked World. Information Systems Journal, 23, 371–375.*

Yoo, Y. (2010). Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 213–231.*

Yoo, Y. (2015). It is not about size: A further thought on big data. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 63-65.*

Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735.*

Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Kallinikos, J., Gregory, R., Burtch, G., Chatterjee, S., & Sarker, S. (2024). The Next Frontiers of Digital Innovation Research. Information Systems Research, 35(4), 1507-1523.*

Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75-89.*

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-05-12

How to Cite

Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., & Bertin, E. (2026). Unpacking Big tech power: A developmental literature review of IS research. Systèmes d’Information Et Management (French Journal of Management Information Systems), 30(3). https://doi.org/10.66450/sim.v30i3.01

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 3 (2025)

Section

Empirical Research Article

License

The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.

It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:

  • ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
  • it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.

 

In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:

  • The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
  • The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).