La dynamique de création de connaissances dans les processus d’innovation : Analyse comparée de quatre études de cas dans le secteur de la santé électronique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3917/sim.104.0093Keywords:
création de connaissances, processus d’innovation, études de cas, santé électronique.Abstract
This paper explores the knowledge creation dynamics within innovation processes based on Information and Communication Technologies. It aims to answer to the following question: what are the knowledge creation stages within innovation processes and how do they overlap? In the context of exploratory qualitative research, four case studies in the e-health sector have been achieved. The results highlight the linking of six stages of knowledge creation within studied innovation processes. Each stage implies specificities in terms of activities of innovation group, knowledge mobilized and created. The four trajectories of knowledge creation are compared in order to discuss of the similarities about the stages overlapping. The main theoretical contribution of this research concerns the building of model of knowledge creation within ICT innovation processes. This descriptive model can be used as a reporting tool for innovation processes.References
Akrich, M., Callon, M. et Latour, B., (1988), « A quoi tient le succès des innovations? L’art de l’intéressement », Gérer et comprendre, Annales des Mines, Vol.11, p.4-17.
Alavi, M. et Leidner, D.E., (2001), “Review : Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems : Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, n°1, 2001, p. 107-136
Anderson, J.R., (1983), The architecture of cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, M., Lindgren, R. et Henfridsson, O., (2008), “Architectural Knowledge in inter-organizational IT innovation”, Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 17, p.19-38.
Argyris, C. et Schon, D.A., (1978), Organizational Learning: A theory of action perspective, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Baets, W.R.J., (1998), Organisational learning and knowledge technologies in a dynamic environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Baumard P., (1994), Organisations déconcertées. Les transformations de la connaissance dans la gestion de situations ambiguës. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris IX-Dauphine.
Belmondo, C., (2002), La création de connaissances dans les groupes de travail - Le cas d’une cellule de veille concurrentielle, Thèse de doctorat en Sciences de Gestion, Université de Lille-I.
Belmondo, C., (2003), « Les phases de création des connaissances dans une cellule de veille. Comparaison de deux processus », Systèmes d’Information et Management, Vol.8, n°2, p 41-68.
Bennett, R.H. et Anthony, W.P, (2001), “Understanding the role of intuition-tacit knowledge and analysis- explicit knowledge in bank deliberations”, in: T.H. Lant et Z. Shapira (Eds.), Organizational Cognition: Computation and interpretation, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, p. 185-209
Boisot, M., (1995), Information Space : A framework for Learning in Organizations. Institutions and Culture. Routledge, New York.
Boisot, M., (1998), Knowledge Assets, Securing competitive advantage in the information economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boland R. J., Lyytinen K., Yoo Y. (2007), “Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction”, Organization Science, Vol.18, n°4, p.631-647.
Brown, J.S. et Duguid, P, (1991), “Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: a unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation”. Organization Science, Vol.2, n°1, p. 40-56
Brown, S.L. et Eisenhardt, K.M., (1998), Competing on the Edge : Strategy as Structured Chaos, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Catellin, S. (2004), L'abduction : une pratique de la découverte scientifique et littéraire, Hermès, Paris.
Chanal, V., (2000), « Communautés de pratique et management par projet », M@n@gement, Vol. 3, n°1, p.103-123.
Chanal V. (2004), “Innovation Management and Organizational Learning : a discursive approach”, European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 7, n°1, p. 56-64.
Chanal, V. et Mothe, C., (2005) « Quel design organisationnel pour combiner innovation d’exploration et innovation d’exploitation? », Facef Pesquisa, Vol.8, n°1, p.84-103.
Chiva-Gomez, R. et Alegre, J., (2005), “Organizational Learning and Organizational Knowledge. Towards the Integration of Two Approaches”, Management Learning, Vol.36, n°1, p. 49-68.
Cohen, W. et Levinthal, D., (1990). “Absorptive Capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, p.128-152
Cooper, R. C. et Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1994), “Screening new products for potential winners; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers”, IEEE engineering management review, Vol.22, n°4, p.24-30.
Cook, S. et Brown, J.S., (1999), “Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance Between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing”, Organization Science, Vol.10, n°4, p.381-400.
Cunha, M. P., Kamoche, K. et Cunha R. C., (2003) "Organisational Improvisation and Leadership. A Field Study in Two Computer-Mediated Settings", Studies of Management and Organisation, Vol. 33, n 1, p. 34-57.
Davenport, T. et Prusak, L., (1998), Working Knowledge : How Organizations manage What they Know ? , Havard business School Press, Boston.
Davis, F. D., (1989). “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, n°3, p.319-339.
Dodgson, M., (1993), “Organizational learning: A review of some literatures”, Organization Studies, Vol.14, n°3: p.375-394.
Dooley, K., et Van de Ven, A.H., (1999), “Explaining complex organizational dynamics,” Organization Science, Vol.10, n°3, p.358-372.
Dyer, J., et H. Singh., (1998), “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Strategy.”, Academy of Management Review, Issue 23, p. 660-679.
Eisenhardt, K.M., (1989), « Building Theories from Case Study Research », Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, n° 4, p. 532-550.
Fiol, C.M., et Lyles, M.A., (1985), “Organizational learning”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.10, n°4, p.803-813.
Flanagan J.C., (1954), “The critical incident technique”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol.51, n°4, pp.327-355.
Forgues B., Vandangeon-Derumez I., (2003), « Analyses longitudinales », in R.-A. Thiétart (dir.), Méthodes de recherche en management, Dunod, pp. 422-448.
Gherardi, S. et Nicolini, D., (2000), “To Transfer is to Transform : The Circulation of Safety Knowledge”, Organization, Vol.7, n°2, p. 329-348.
Girod, M., 1995, « La mémoire organisationnelle », Revue Française de Gestion, n° 105, p. 30-42.
Glaser, B. et Strauss, A., (1967), The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Grant, R.M., (1996), “Toward a Knowledge-based theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, N°14, p. 109-122
Habib J. et Keramidas O., (2007), “An innovative project for equity and mobilisation at work? The case of IRIS project in a French territorial civil service”, in International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Publisher, vol.7, n°1, p.4-16.
Hall, R., et Andriani P., (2002), “Managing Knowledge for Innovation”, Longe Range Planning, Vol.35, p.29-48.
Hamel, G, (1991), “Breaking the Frame : Strategy as Stretch and Leverage”, Working Paper London Business School, December.
Hamel, G., (2000), Leading the revolution. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
Harkema, S.J.M. (2004), Complexity and emergent learning in innovation projects. Veenendaal: Universal Press.
Hedberg, Bo.L.T, Nystrom, P.C et Starbuck, W.H., (1976), “Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self-Designing Organization”, Administrative Science Quarterly, March 1976, Vol.21, p. 41-65.
Hedberg, Bo.L.T, (1981), “How Organizations Learn and Unlearn”, in P. Nyström et W.Starbuck, Handbook of Organizational Design, Oxford University Press, London, p. 3-27.
Hlady-Rispal, M., (2002), La méthode des cas. Application à la recherche en gestion. Bruxelles, DeBoeck.
Iansiti M. et MacCormack A., (1997), “Developing Products on Internet Time”, Harvard Business Review, septembre-octobre, p.108-117.
Janicot C. et Mignon S. (2008), «Vers un modèle de codification des connaissances: nature et perspectives», Systèmes d’Information et Management, Vol. 13, n°4, p.95-121.
Khurana, A. et Rosenthal, S. R., (1998), “Towards holistic “front ends“ in new product development”; The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.15, n°1, p.57-74
Lam A., (2000), “Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions : an Integrated Framework”, Organization Studies, Vol.21, n°3, p.487-513
Lan, P. et Du, H.H., (2002), “Challenges ahead E-innovation”, Technovation, Vol.22, n°12, p. 761-767.
Langley, A., (1999), “Strategies for theorizing from process data”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, n°4, p.691-710.
Lave, J. et Wenger E, (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leonard, D. et Sensiper, S. (1998) “The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation”, California Management Review, Vol. 40, n°3, p.112-132
Lincoln, Y.S. et Guba, E.G., (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage
Lundvall, B.A. et Johnson, B. (1994), "The learning economy", Journal of Industry Studies, Vol.1, n°2, p.23-42.
Lyytinen, K. et Rose, G.M., (2003), “The disruptive nature of information technology innovations: the case of Internet computing in systems development organizations”, MIS Quarterly, Vol.27, n°4, p.557-595.
Mack, M., (1995), « L’organisation apprenante comme système de transformation de la connaissance en valeur », Revue Française de Gestion, sept-oct 1995, p. 43-55
March, J. G., (1991), “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”, Organization Science, Vol.2, p.71–87.
Mason, R.M., (1993), “Strategic information systems: Use of information technology in a learning organization”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences '93, CA: IEEE Press, p.840-849.
Maturana, H.R. et Varela, F.J. (1994), L’arbre de la connaissance: Racines biologiques de la compréhension humaine, Paris, France : Addison Wesley France.
Miles, M.B. et Huberman, A.M., (2003), Analyse des données qualitatives. 2ème édition, Edition de Boeck Université, Paris-Bruxelles. (1ère édition en 1991).
Morin E., (1992), La Méthode, T3 : La Connaissance de la Connaissance : anthropologie de la connaissance. Paris, Seuil, 246 p.
Newell, A. et Simon, H. A., (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
Nyíri, J.K. et Smith, B., (1988), Practical Knowledge: Outlines of a Theory of Traditions and Skills, New York: Croom Helm.
Nonaka, I., (1991), “The knowledge-Creating Company”, Havard Business Review on Knowledge Management, Vol. 69, n°6, p.21-45.
Nonaka, I., (1994), “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”, Organization Science, Vol.5, n°1, p.14-37.
Nonaka, I. et Takeuchi, H, (1995), The Knowledge-creating company: how japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
Orlikowski, W., (2002), “Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing”, Organization Science, Vol.13, n°3, p.249–273.
Orr, J. E., (1990), “Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: community memory in a service culture”, in Middleton D. S. et Edwards D. (Eds), Collective Remembering, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, p. 169-189.
Polanyi, M., (1966), The tacit dimension , Routledge and Kegan, London.
Prax, J.Y., (2000), Le guide du Knowledge management, Dunod, Paris.
Prigogine, I. et Stengers, I., (1984), Order out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. New York: Benta.
Quinn, J.B., (1985), “Managing Innovation: controlled chaos”, Havard Business Review, Vol.3, p.73-84.
Reagans, R. et McEvily, B., (2003), “Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Transfer Problem Revisited”, Working Paper Columbia University, New York.
Reix, R., (1995), « Savoir tacite et savoir formalisé dans l'entreprise », Revue Française de Gestion, n° 105, septembre-octobre, p.17-28
Rogers E. M., (1995), Diffusion of Innovations. 4th edition, New York, The Free Press.
Ring, P. et Van de Ven, A.H., (1994), “Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19, p. 90-118.
Scarbrough, H., Swan, J., Newell, S., Hislop, D. (2000), Innovation Processes and the management of knowledge, Knowledge Management: concepts and Controversies, University of Warwick, Coventry, p. 2-29.
Senge, P.M., (1990), The fifth discipline, New York: Doubleday
Spender, J.C., (1993), “Competitive advantage from tacit knowledge: unpacking the concept and its strategic implications”, proceedings de l’Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Atlanta, (8 août 1993)
Spender, J.C., (1996), “Making knowledge the basis of dynamic theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, p. 45-62.
Starbuck, W.H.,(1983), “Organizations as action generators”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, Février, p. 91-102.
Stacey, R. D., (2003), “Strategic management and organisational dynamics: the challenge of complexity”, Fourth edition. Financial Times/Pearson Education, Edinburgh, UK.
Stenmark, D. (2001), “The Relationship between Information and Knowledge”, in Proceedings of Iris 24, Ulvik, Norvège, 11-14 Août 2001.
Strauss, A. L., (1987), Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York : Cambridge
Strauss A.L. et Corbin J., (1990), Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage publications.
Sveiby, K.E. (2001), “What is Knowledge Management ?” – http://www.sveiby.com.
Swanson, E. B., (1994), "Information Systems Innovations among Organizations", Management Science, Vol. 40, n°9, p. 1069-1092
Tuomi, I. (2002) Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tsoukas, H. et Vladimirou, E., (2001), “What is organizational knowledge?”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol.38, n°7, p.973-993
Van de Ven, A.H., (1986), “Central problems in the management of innovation”, Management Science, Vol. 32, n°5, may, p. 590-607.
Van de Ven, A.H. et Poole M.S., (1989), "Methods for studying innovation processes", In Van de Ven A.H., Angle H.L. et Poole M.S., (Eds), Research on the management on innovation, the Minnesota Studies, New-York, Harper and Row, p 31-54
Van de Ven, A.H, (1992), “Suggestion for studying Strategy Process: a Research Note”, Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13 (Summer Special Issue), p. 169-188.
Van de Ven, A. H., Angle, H. L., Poole, M.S et alii (2000), Research on the Management of Innovation: the Minnesota Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 719 p.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., et Davis, F. D. (2003). “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, Vol.27, n°3, p. 425-478.
Vinck, D., (1997), « La connaissance : ses objets et ses institutions », in Fouet J.M (éd.) Intégration du savoir-faire. Capitalisation des connaissances, Ed. Hermes, Paris, p. 55-91
Von Krogh, G., Roos J. et Slocum K., (1994), “An Essay on Corporate Epistemology”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 15, p 53-71.
Vygotsky, L.S., (1962), Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Weick, K. E., (1979), The Social Psychology of Organizing. Ed Mc Graw-Hill, Inc., 2ème Edition, New York, 294 p.
Weick, K.E, (1993), “The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster”, Administrative Science Quarterly; Vol. 38, n°4, p.628-652.
Weick, K. E., (1995), Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Weick, K. E., (1998), “Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis”, Organization Science, vol. 9, p. 543-555.
Wenger, E., (1998), Communities of Practice, Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
Wiig, K.M., (1997), “Integrating Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, n°3, p.399-405.
Winter, S., (1987), “Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets”, in Teece D., The Competitive Challenge, Ballinger, 170p.
Yin, R.K., (1994), Applications of case study research, Design and methods, Applied social research methods series. 5. Leonard Bickman, Beverly Hills, Sage.
Zaltman G., Duncan R. et Holbeck J., (1973), Innovation and organization. John Wiley
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.
It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:
- ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
- it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.
In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:
- The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
- The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).
