De l’intégration interne du système d’information à l’intégration du système d’information de la chaîne logistique
Keywords:
Intrafunctional IS integration, external IS integration, ERP, correlation and causality, contingency variables, supply chainAbstract
The paper aims at testing if there exists a relationship between internal IS integration and external IS integration. The analysis is based on the literature that links internal and external integration and proposes a set of contingency variables. Contrary to operational research literature, Venkatraman’s scheme of evolutionary stages emphasizes a disconnect between internal and external. Using data from the COI-TIC survey, synthetic indicators of intrafunctional IS integration and supply chain IS integration are built and their explanatory factors are analyzed on a sample of 9721 firms. Among technologies used internally, ERP have the greatest influence on intrafunctional IS integration and are the best predictor of supply chain IS integration. Economic sectors show discrepancies between intrafunctional and external IS integration.References
Al-Mudimigh A., Zairi M. et Ahmed A.M. (2004), “Extending the Concept of Supply Chain: the Effective Management of Value Chains”, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 87, n°3, p. 309-320.
Beatty R. et Williams C. (2006), “ERPII : best practices for successfully implementing an ERP upgrade”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 49, n°3, p. 105-109.
Bensaou M. et Venkatraman N. (1995), “Configurations of Interorganizational Relationships: a Comparison between US and Japanese Automakers”, Management Science, vol. 41, n°9, p. 1471- 92.
Benzoni L., Lebart L. et Rowe F. (1991), “Market Dynamics and Technological Segmentation: the Case of the French Professional Telecommunication Market”, in Antonelli C. (Ed.), The economics of information networks, North-Holland.
Bidan M. (2004), « Fédération et intégration des applications du système d’Information de Gestion ». Systèmes d’Information et Management, vol. 9, n°2, p. 5-24.
Bidan M. et Rowe F. (2004), “Urbanization Practices and Strategic Behavior: Openness of Architecture and Enactment in two Medium Sized Companies”. 9ième Colloque de l’Association Information & Management, Mai, Evry, France.
Blackwell M., Iacus S., King G. et Porro G. (2009), "Coarsened Exact Matching in Stata", Stata Journal, vol. 9, n°4, p. 524-46.
Clergeau C. et Rowe F. (2005), « Caractérisation des dispositifs d'interdépendance organisationnelle et mutualisation : le cas des centres d'appels virtuels », Systèmes d'Information et Management, vol. 10, n°3, p. 93-116.
de Corbière F. et Geffroy-Maronnat B. (2009), « Des formes d’intégration intra-organisationnelle aux formes d’intégration interorganisationnelle : analyse du cas des catalogues électroniques », 16ième Colloque de l’Association Information & Management, Juin, Marrakech, Maroc.
Daniel E. et White A. (2005), “The Future of Interorganizational System Linkages: Findings of an International Delphi Study”, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.14, n°2, p. 188-203.
Davenport T. (1998), “Putting the Enterprise in the Enterprise System”, Harvard Business Review, n°76, pp. 121-131.
El Amrani R., Rowe F. et Geffroy-Maronnat B. (2006), “The effects of ERP Implementation Strategy on Cross-Functionality”, Information Systems Journal, vol. 16, n°1, p. 79-104.
El Amrani R. et Saint Léger G., (2011), « Le pari des centres de compétences dans la stabilisation des organisations en phase post-projet ERP », Systèmes d'Information et Management, vol. 16, n°1, p. 69-112.
Fernandez V., Picory C. et Rowe F. (1996), « Outils de gestion et espaces concurrentiels des PME », Revue Internationale des PME, vol. 9, n°1, p. 79-102.
Filmer D. et Pritchett L.H. (2001), “Estimating Wealth Effect without Expenditure Data – or Tears: an Application to Educational Enrollments in States of India”, Demography, vol. 38, p. 115-132.
Gattiker T. et Goodhue D. (2005), "What Happens after ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Inter-Dependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes", MIS Quarterly, vol. 29, n°3, p. 559-585.
Goode S. et Gregor S. (2009), “Rethinking Organisational Size: Meaning, Measurement and Redevelopment”, European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 18, n°1, p. 14-25.
Gunasekaran A. et Ngai E. (2004), “Information Systems in Supply Chain Integration and Management”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 159, n°2, p. 269-95.
Hart P. et Saunders C.S. (1997), “Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange”, Organization Science, vol. 8, n°1, p. 23-42.
Iacus S.M., King G. et Porro G. (2011), "Multivariate Matching Methods that are Monotonic Imbalance Bounding", Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 106, p. 345-361.
Koh S.C.L., Gunasekaran A. et Rajkumar D. (2008), “ERP II: The involvement, benefits and impediments of collaborative information sharing”, International Journal of Production Economics, vol.113, n°1, p. 245-268.
Koh S.C.L., Gunasekaran A. et Goodman T. (2011), “Drivers, barriers and critical success factors for ERPII implementation in supply chains: A critical analysis”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 20, n°4, p. 385-402.
Klein, R. et Rai A. (2009), “Interfirm Strategic Information Flows in Logistics Supply Chain Relationships”, MIS Quarterly, vol.33, n°4, p. 735-762.
Kumar K. et Van Dissel H.G. (1996), “Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 20, n°3, p. 279-300.
Livolsi L. et Fabbe-Costes N. (2004), « la centralité des systèmes d'information (SI) dans la fonction logistique », Revue Française de Gestion Industrielle, vol. 23, n°4, p. 27-44.
Lee G., et Xia W. (2006), “Organizational Size and IT Innovation Adoption: A Meta-Analysis“, Information and Management, vol. 43, n°8, p. 975-85.
Markus M.L. (2000), “Paradigm Shifts—E-Business and Business/Systems Integration”, Communications of the AIS, vol. 4, article 10.
Mintzberg H. (1982), Structure et dynamique des organisations, Editions d’Organisations : Paris.
Overby J. et Min S. (2001), “International Supply Chain Management in an International Environment”, International Marketing Review, vol. 18, n°4, p. 392-420.
Patnayakuni R., Rai A. et Seth N. (2006), “Relational Antecedents of Information Flow Integration for Supply Chain Coordination”, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 23, n°1, p. 13-49.
Prajogo D. et Olhager J. (2012), “Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration”, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 135, n°1, p. 514-522.
Porter M. (1985), Competitive Advantage, The Free Press: New York.
Rai A., Patnayakuni R. et Patnayakuni N. (2006), “Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally-enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 30, n°2, p. 225-46.
Reix R., Fallery B., Kalika M. et Rowe F. (2011), Systèmes d'Information et Management des Organisations, 6ème édition, Vuibert, 496 pages.
Riggins F.J. et Mukhopadhyay T. (1994), “Interdependent Benefits from Interorganizational Systems: Opportunities for Business Process Re-engineering”, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 11, n°2, p. 37-57.
Seddon P., Calvert C. et Yang S. (2010), “A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems”, MIS Quarterly, vol.34, n°2, p. 305-328.
Srinivasan K., Kekre S. et Mukhopadhyay T. (1994), “Impact of Electronic Data Interchange Technology on JIT Shipments”, Management Science, vol. 40, n°10, p. 1291-1304.
Stigler G. (1951), “The Division of Labour is Limited by the Extent of the Market”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 59, p. 185-93
Strong, D. et Volkoff O. (2010), “Understanding Organization-Enterprise System Fit: A Path to Theorizing the Information Technology Artifact”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 34, n°4, p. 731-756.
Su Y.-F. et Yang C. (2010), “Why are Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Indispensable to Supply Chain Management?”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 203, n°1, p. 81-94.
Subramani M. (2004), “How do Suppliers benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relationships?”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 28, n°1, p. 45-73.
Swafford P., Ghosh S. et Murthy N. (2008), “Achieving Supply Chain Agility through IT Integration and Flexibility”, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 116, n°2, p. 288-97.
Themistocleous M., Irani Z. et Love P. (2004), “Evaluating the Integration of Supply Chain Information Systems: a Case Study”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 159, n°2, p. 393-405.
Truman G.E. (2000), “Integration in Electronic Exchange Environments”, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 17, n°1, p. 209-44.
Venkatraman N. (1994), “IT-enabled Business Transformation: from Automation to Business Scope Redefinition”, Sloan Management Review, vol. 35, n°2, p. 73-87.
Volkoff O., Strong D. et Elmes M. (2005), “Understanding enterprise systems-enabled integration”, vol. 14, n°2, p. 110-120.
Vyas S. et Kumaranayake L. (2006), “Constructing Socio-Economic Status Indices: how to use Principal Components Analysis”, Health Policy and Planning, vol. 21, n°6, p. 459-68.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.
It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:
- ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
- it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.
In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:
- The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
- The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).