Feminist approach and IS research: a study of MIS Quarterly
Keywords:
research approach, feminism, gender, information systems, information technologyAbstract
Over a few decades, some research in several academic fields (history, anthropology, sociology, education, management…) has questioned the social construction of gender roles. Despite their diversity, most of these works share a research approach that can be named ‘feminist approach’. The objective of this article is to use this approach to understand how gender is taken into account in information systems research, and more precisely in a leading journal, MIS Quarterly. First, we describe the different dimensions of a feminist approach. Then, all the articles mentioning “gender” have been examined using this framework, whether the term gender is used as a demographic variable or refers to male-female social relations. Results suggest that using a feminist approach could be of interest for improving IS research, providing additional rigor, and more robust findings, less flawed by cultural biases. Then, researchers can be questioned on their contribution in consolidating stereotypes and gender norms in IS. Last, a feminist approach in IS research could open the way to new ideas.
References
Abbate, J. (2012), Recoding gender: women's changing participation in computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.
Adam, A., Howcroft, D., Richardson, H. (2004), “A decade of neglect: reflecting on gender and IS”, New Technology, Work and Employment, vol. 19, n° 3, p.222-240.
Adler, P. S., Forbes, L. C., Willmott, H. (2007), “Critical management studies”, The Academy of Management Annals, vol. 1, n°1, p.119-179.
Allen, D. K., Brown, A., Karanasios, S., Norman, A. (2013), “How Should Technology-Mediated Organizational Change Be Explained? A Comparison of the Contributions of Critical Realism and Activity Theory”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 37, n°3, p.835-854.
Alvesson, M. (1993), “Organizations as rhetoric: Knowledge‐intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 30, n°6, p.997-1015.
Avison, D., Fitzgerald, G. (2012), “Reflections and opinions on 25 years with the ISJ”, Information Systems Journal, vol. 22, n°6, p.179–193.
Bem, S. L. (1974), “The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 42, n°2, p.155–162.
Benbasat, I., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P.A. (2010), “Introduction to the special issue on novel perspectives on trust in information systems”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 34, n°2, p.367-371.
Bereni, L., Chauvin, S., Jaunait, A., Revillard, A. (2008), Introduction aux Gender Studies, De Boeck, Louvain-la-Neuve.
Bilge, S. (2009), “Théorisations féministes de l'intersectionnalité”, Diogène, vol. 1, n°225, p.70-88.
Bourdieu, P. (1998), La Domination masculine, Seuil, Paris.
Braidotti, R., Degraef, V. (1990), “Théories des études féministes : quelques expériences contemporaines en Europe”, Les Cahiers du GRIF, n°45, p.29-50.
Brooke, C. (2002), “Editorial: Critical Research in Information Systems: Issue 1”, Journal of Information Technology, vol. 17, n°2, p.45-47.
Bussey, K., Bandura, A. (1999), “Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation”, Psychological Review, n°106, p.676-713.
Butler, J. ( 1990), Gender trouble, Routledge, Oxford. Traduction française : Butler,J. (2005),Trouble dans le genre, La Découverte, Paris.
Calluzzo, V.J., Cante, C.J. (2004), “Ethics in Information Technology and Software Use”, Journal of Business Ethics, n°51, p.301-312.
Catalyst (1992), “Women in Engineering: An Untapped Resource”, Rapport disponible en ligne, http://www.catalyst.org/file/225/women_in_engineering_an_untapped_resource.pdf
Checkland, P., Scholes, J. (1990), Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley, Etats-Unis.
Clayton, K., Beekhuyzen, J., Nielsen, S. (2012), “Now I know what ICT can do for me!”, Information Systems Journal, vol. 22, n°5, p.375–390.
Cloutier, J. (2008), “Genre et justice organisationnelle”. In : Cornet, A. Laufer J., Belghiti-Mahut S. (Coord.) GRH et genre, Vuibert, Paris, p.159-179.
Cronan, T.P., Leonard, L.N.K., Kreie, J. (2005), “An Empirical Validation of Perceived Importance and Behavior Intention in IT Ethics”, Journal of Business Ethics, n°56, p. 231-238.
Cursan, A. (2014), Impact de l'ostracisme au sein d'un groupe d'individus de même sexe ou de sexe opposé sur les performances à plusieurs tâches stéréotypées selon le genre, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Bordeaux.
De Raadt, J. D. R. (1989), “Multi‐modal systems design: A concern for the issues that matter”, Systems Research, vol. 6, n°1, p.17–25.
Delphy, C. (2001), L'ennemi principal : Penser le genre (Vol. 2), Syllepse, Paris.
Farinaz, F., Kradolfer, S. (Eds) (2010), Le plafond de fer de l’Université: femmes et carrières, Seismo, Zürich.
Fournier, V., Grey, C. (2000), “At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies”, Human Relations, vol. 53, n°1, p.7-32.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000), Sexing the body, Basic Books, New York. Traduction française : Fausto-Sterling, A. (2012), Corps en tous genres, La Découverte, Paris.
F/LOSS (2006), “Free/Libre/Open Source Software: Policy Support. Gender: Integrated Report of Findings, European Union-FP6”, http://flosspols.org.
Frieze, C., Quesenberry, J. (2013), “From Difference to Diversity: Including Women in the Changing Face of Computing”, Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Denver, USA.
Gilligan, C. (1982), In a Different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.
Glass, R. L. (2012), “The Gender Gap: Does It Include Information Systems”, Information Systems Management, vol. 29, n°1, p.83-84.
Goffman, E. (1977), “The Arrangement between the Sexes”, Theory and Society, vol. 4, n°3, p.301-331. Traduction française : Goffman, E. (2002), L’arrangement des sexes, La Dispute, Paris.
Grundy, F. (1996), Women and Computers, Intellect, Bristol, UK.
Guillaumin, C. (1978), “Pratique du pouvoir et idée de Nature (1). L'appropriation des femmes”, Questions féministes, n°2, p.5-30.
Guillot, V. (2008), “Émergence et activités de l’organisation internationale des
intersexué·e·s”, Nouvelles Questions Féministes, vol. 27, n°1, p. 144-150.
Gupta, B., Dasgupta, S., Gupta, A. (2008), “Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 17, n°2, p.140–154.
Gürer D.W., (1995), “Pioneering Women in Computer Science”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 58, n°1, p.45-54.
Habermas, J. (1973), “Connaissance et intérêt”. In : La technique et la science comme idéologie, Gallimard, Paris, p.133-162.
Haraway, D. (2007), “Savoirs situés : la question de la science dans le féminisme et le privilège de la perspective partielle”. In : Manifeste cyborg et autres essais, Exils, Paris, p.107-135. Traduction française de : Haraway, D. (1988), “Situated knowledge : the science question in feminism as a site of discourse on the privilege of partial perspective”, Feminist Studies, vol.14, n°3, p.575-599.
Harding, S. (1987), “Introduction: Is there a feminist method?” In: S.G. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, p.1-14.
Harding, S. (1993), “Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’?” In: Alcoff, L., Potter, E. (1993) Feminist epistemologies, Routledge, Oxford, p.49-82.
Héritier, F. (2002), Masculin/Féminin II. Dissoudre la hiérarchie, Odile Jacob, Paris.
Hirschheim R., Newman, M. (1991), “Symbolism and information systems development: myth, metaphor and magic”, Information Systems Research, vol. 2, n°1, p.29-62.
Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K. (1994), “Realizing Emancipatory Principles in Information Systems Development: The Case for ETHICS”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 18, n°1, p.83-109.
Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values, Sage, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Hurtig, M.C., Pichevin, M.F. (1995), “Psychologie et essentialisme: un inquiétant renouveau”, Nouvelles Questions Féministes, vol. 16, n°3, p.7-32.
Jasperson, J., Carte, T.A., Saunders, C.S., Butler, B.S., Croes, H.J.P., Zheng, W. (2002), “Review: power and information technology research: a metatriangulation review”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 26, n°4, p.397–459.
Jonas, I. (2010), “Psychologie évolutionniste, mixité et sexisme bienveillant”, Travail, Genre et Sociétés, vol. 1, n°23, p.205-211.
Joshi, K. (1989), “The Measurement of Fairness or Equity Perceptions of Management Information Systems Users”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, n°3, p.343-358.
Kaiser ,A., Haller, S., Schmitz, S., Nitsch, C. (2009), “On sex/gender related similarities and differences in fMRI language research”, Brain Research Reviews, vol. 61, p.49-59.
Kergoat, D. (2000), “Division sexuelle du travail et rapports sociaux de sexe”. In : Hirata, H., Laborie, F., Le Doaré, H., Senotier, D. (Coord.), Dictionnaire critique du féminisme, PUF, Paris, p.35-44.
Lagesen, V. (2011), “Getting women in computer science”. In : Sorensen K., Faulkner W., Rommes E. (Eds), Technologies of inclusion. Gender in the information society, Tapir, Trondheim.
Lagesen, V. A. (2008), “A cyberfeminist utopia? Perceptions of gender and computer science among Malaysian women computer science students and faculty”, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 33, n°1, 5-27.
Lamb, R., Kling, R. (2003), “Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, n°2, p.197-235.
Laqueur, T. (1990), Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud, Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Traduction française : Laqueur, T. (1992), La fabrique du sexe, Gallimard, Paris.
Lather, P. (1991), Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern, Routledge, Oxford.
Latour, B. (1989), La Science en Action, La Découverte, Paris.
Lerman, N.E., Mohun, A.P., Oldenziel, R. (2001), “L’histoire des techniques et la question du genre : état des travaux et perspectives pour l’avenir”. In : Chabaud-Rychter, D., Gardey, D. (Dir.), L’engendrement des choses : Des hommes, des femmes et des techniques, Archives Contemporaines, Paris, p.71-87. Traduction de : (1997) “The shoulders we stand on and the view from here: Historiography and directions for research”, Technology and Culture, vol. 38, n°1, p.9-30.
MacKenzie, D., Wajcman, J. (Eds.) (1985), The social shaping of technology, Open University Press, Maidenhead.
Maddox, B. (2003), “The double helix and the 'wronged heroine’ ”, Nature, vol. 421, n°6921, p.407-408.
Margolis, J., Fisher, A. (2003), Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Maruani, M. (2011), Travail et emploi des femmes, La Découverte, Paris.
Mathieu, N. C. (1991), L'anatomie politique : catégorisations et idéologies du sexe, Côté-femmes Éditions, Paris.
Misa, T. J. (Ed.) (2011), Gender codes: Why women are leaving computing, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
Morley, C. (2004), “Masculin/féminin. Le genre des technologies de l’information”, Revue Française de Gestion, vol.1, n°148, p.67-86.
Morley, C., Mc Donnell, M. (2015), “The gendering of computer programming in Finland, France and the United Kingdom between 1960 and 1990”. In: Schafer, V., Thierry, B. (Eds.), Women, Gender and ICT, p.119-135, Springer International Publishing, Basel Suisse.
Morley, C., Mc Donnell, M. (2017), “Discriminations dans le domaine technique : le fonctionnement du stéréotype de genre”. In : M.Eberhard, J.Laufer, D .Meurs, F.Pigeyre et P.Simon (Coord.), Genre et discriminations, Éditions iXe, Donnemarie-Dontilly, p.49-70.
Moron-Puech, B. (2016), “Le respect des droits des personnes intersexuées - Chantiers à venir ?”, La Revue des droits de l’homme, http://journals.openedition.org/revdh/2815.
Morris, M. G., Venkatesh, V., Ackerman, P. L. (2005), “Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: An extension to the theory of planned behavior”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 52, n°1, p.69-84.
Mumford, E. (1983), Designing Human Systems for New Technology - The ETHICS Method, Manchester Business School Publisher, Manchester.
Myers, M.D., Klein, H.K. (2011), “A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 35, n°1, p.17-36.
Mylonopoulos, N. A., Theoharakis, V. (2001), “On site: global perceptions of IS journals”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 44, n°9, p.29-33.
Oakley A. (1972), Sex, gender and society, Ashgate Publishing, Farnham.
Ong, M. (2011), “Broadening Participation The Status of Women of Color in Computer Science”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 54, n°7, p.32-34.
Othman, M., Latih, R. (2006), “Women in computer science: no shortage here!”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 49, n°3, p.111-114.
Perrot, M. (1998), Les femmes ou les silences de l'histoire, Flammarion, Paris.
Picq, P. (2006), “L’éternel féminin en paléoanthropologie et en préhistoire”. In: Vidal C. (Dir.), Féminin Masculin, Mythes et idéologies, Belin, Paris, p.95-110.
Poulin, C., Ross, L.R. (1997), “Recherche sur la violence familiale : contribution des différentes epistemologies”, Criminologie, vol. 30, n°2, p.7-25.
Pozzebon, M., Mackrell, D., Nielsen, S. (2014), “Structuration bridging diffusion of innovations and gender relations theories: a case of paradigmatic pluralism in IS research”, Information Systems Journal, vol. 24, n°3, p.229-248.
Pruvost G., Gestin A. (2001), « À propos du féminisme », Mouverments, n°15-16, p.174-177.
Recker J. C., Young, R., Darroch, F., Marshall, P., McKay, J. (2009), “ACIS 2007 panel report: lack of relevance in IS research”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 24, n°18, p.303-314.
Reid M.F., Allen M.W., Armstrong D., Riemenschneider C.K. (2010), “Perspectives on challenges facing women in IS: the cognitive gender gap”, European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 19, n°5, p.526–539.
Robertson, M., Newell, S., Swan, J., Mathiassen, L., Bjerknes, G. (2001), “The issue of gender within computing: reflections from the UK and Scandinavia”, Information Systems Journal, vol. 11, n°2, p.111–126.
Ronay, R., Kim. D.Y (2006), “Gender differences in explicit and implicit risk attitudes: A socially facilitated phenomenon”, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 45, n°2, p.397-419.
Scott, J. W. (1986), “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis”, The American Historical Review, vol. 91, n°5, p.1053-1075.
Scott, J. W. (2010), “Fantasmes du millénaire: le futur du «genre» au XXIe siècle”, Clio. Femmes, Genre, Histoire, vol. 32, p.89-117.
Shaw, M. C., Stahl B.C. (2011), “On Quality and Communication: The Relevance of Critical Theory to Health Informatics”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 12, n°3, p.255-273.
Stengers, I. (2010), “L’étoffe du chercheur : une construction genrée ?”, In (Farinaz & Kradolfer, 2010), p.25-40.
Taylor, V. (1998), “Feminist Methodology in Social Movements Research”, Qualitative Sociology, vol. 21, n°4, p.357-379.
Taylor,V. E. (2010), “Broadening Participation: Cultivating Cultural Diversity in Information Technology”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, n°7, p.35-36.
Terrade, F., Pasquier, H., Reerinck-Boulanger, J., Guingouain, G., Somat, A. (2010), “L'acceptabilité sociale: la prise en compte des déterminants sociaux dans l'analyse de l'acceptabilité des systèmes technologiques”, Le travail humain, vol. 72, n°4, p.383-395.
Théry, I. (2011), Qu’est-ce que la distinction de sexe ?, Fabert, Paris.
Trauth, E.M. (2006), “Theorizing gender and information technology research”, Encyclopedia of gender and information technology, vol.2, p.1154-1159.
Trauth, E.M. (2011), “Rethinking gender and MIS for the twenty-first century”. In: Galliers, R.D., Currie, W., The Oxford Handbook of Management Information Systems: Critical Perspectives and New Directions, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p.560-585.
Trauth, E.M. (2013), “The role of theory in gender and information systems research”, Information and Organization, vol. 23, n°4, p.277-293.
Trauth, E.M., Cain, C.C., Joshi, K.D., Kvasny, L., Booth, K. (2012), “Understanding Underrepresentation in IT through Intersectionality”, Proceedings of the 2012 iConference, Toronto, p. 56-62.
Trauth, E.M., Kvasny, L., Greenhill, A. (2007), “Conducting Feminist Gender Research in the Information Systems Field”. In: Stahl, B.C. (Ed.), Issues and Trends in Technology and Human Interaction, IGI Global, Hershey, p.1-24.
Trauth, E.M., Niederman, F. (2006), “Achieving diversity in the IT workforce: issues & interventions”, SIGMIS Database, vol. 37, n°4, p.8-10.
Ungerleider, L.G., Doyon, J., Karni, A. (2002), “Imaging brain plasticity during motor skill learning”, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, vol. 78, p.553–564.
Vidal, C., Benoit-Browaeys D. (2005), Cerveau, sexe et pouvoir, Belin, Paris.
Vidal, C. (2001), “Quand l’idéologie envahit la science du cerveau”, La Recherche, vol. 6, p.75-79.
Wacjman, J. (1991), Feminism confronts technology, The Pennsylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania University Park.
Wager, T.D., Phan, K.L., Liberzon, I., Taylor, S.F. (2003), “Valence, gender, and lateralization of functional brain anatomy in emotion: a meta-analysis of findings from neuroimaging”, Neuroimage, vol.19, n°3, p.513-531.
Walsham, G., Robey, D., Sahay, S. (2007), “Foreword: Special Issue on Information Systems in Developing Countries”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 31, n°2, p.317-326.
Wenneras, C., Wold, A. (1997), “Nepotism and sexism in peer-review”, Nature, vol. 387, n°22, p.341-343.
West, C., Zimmerman, D.H. (1987), “Doing Gender”, Gender and Society, vol. 1, n°2, p.125-151.
Williams, R., Edge, D. (1996), “The social shaping of technology”, Research Policy, vol. 25, p.865-899.
Wilson, M. (2004), “A conceptual framework for studying gender in information systems research”, Journal of Information Technology, vol. 19, n°1, p.81-92.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.
It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:
- ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
- it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.
In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:
- The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
- The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).
