Numérique et Symbolique

Authors

  • Aurélie Dudézert Université Paris Saclay
  • Nathalie Mitev King’s College, London Université Paris-Dauphine Université de Münster
  • Ewan Oiry ESG-UQAM

References

Bijker, W. E., Hughes T. P., & Pinch T. (2012). The Social Constructions of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, MIT Press.

De Vaujany, F.-X., & Mitev, N. (2015), « De la matérialité en théorie des organisations : Tour, retour ou détour ? ». In F.-X. de Vaujany, J.-F. Chanlat & A. Hussenot (Eds.), Tournants en théorie des organisations, Paris : Economica.

Dudézert A., Bossard-Préchoux V., & Grimand A. (2017), « La technologie-Totem : les Technologies de l’Information créatrices d’identité métier chez les chercheurs en entreprise », Revue Française de Gestion, Volume 43, Numéro 267, août-septembre 2017, p. 45-63

Dudézert A., Fayard P., & Oiry E. (2015), « Astérix et la gestion des connaissances 2.0 : une exploration de l’appropriation des SGC 2.0 par le mythe du Village Gaulois », Systèmes d'Information et Management, Vol. 20, N° 1, p. 31-59

Dudézert A., & Leidner DE (2011). “Illusions of control and social domination strategies in knowledge mapping system use”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 20, N°5, p. 574-588

Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G. (1981), “Information in organizations as Signal and Symbol,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, N°2, p. 171-186.

Gioia D.A., Thomas J.B., Clark S.M., & Chittipeddi K. (1994), “Symbolism and Strategic Change in Academia: The Dynamics of Sensemaking and Influence”, Organization Science, Vol. 5, N°3, p. 363-383

Hirschheim R., & Newman M. (1991), “Symbolism and Information Systems Development: Myth, Metaphor and Magic,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, N°1, p. 29-62

Karoui M., Dudézert A, & Leidner DE (2015), “Strategies and symbolism in the adoption of organizational social networking systems” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 24, N°1, p. 15-32.

Karoui M., & Dudézert A. (2012), « Capital Social et enjeux de pouvoir : Une Perspective Socio-Politique de l’Appropriation d’une Technologie de Réseaux Sociaux au Sein d’une Collectivité Territoriale », Systèmes d'Information et Management, Vol. 17, n°1, p. 49-80

Larousse (2016), http://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/symbole/76051

Leonardi (2011), “When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of Human and Material Agencies”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, N°1, p. 147-167

Mitev, N. (2018). « Wanda Orlikowski, une pionnière entre théories sociales, théorie des organisations et systèmes d’information ». In M. Kalika, I. Walsh, & C. Dominguez Pery (Eds.), Les Grands Auteurs en Management des Systèmes d’Information. EMS Editions, Collection Management et Société (Collection dirigée par G. Charreaux, P. Joffre and G. Koenig).

Ologéanu-Taddeï R., Fallery B., Oiry E., & Tchobanian R. (2014), « Usages des outils collaboratifs : le rôle des formes organisationnelles et des politiques de ressources humaines », Management et Avenir, n°67, p. 180-194.

Orlikowski, W.J. (2005), “Material works: Exploring the situated entanglement of technological performativity and human agency,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 17, N°1, p.183–186.

Orlikowski W.J. (2007), “Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work”, Organization Studies, Vol. 28, n°9, p. 1493-1448.

Orlikowski, W.J., & Scott, S.V. (2008). “Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization”, Annals of the Academy of Management, Vol. 2, N°1, p. 433-474.

Pinch T. J., & Bijker W. E. (1984), “The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other”, Social Studies of Science, p. 399-441.

Swanson, E. B., & Ramiller, N. C. (1997), “The organizing vision in information systems innovation”. Organization Science, Vol. 8, N°5, p. 458-474.

Vygotski, L. (1997), Pensée et Langage, éditions La Dispute.

Yanow D. (2006), “Studying physical artifacts: An interpretive approach.” In A. Rafaeli, & M. Pratt (Eds.), Artifacts and organizations: Beyond mere symbolism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, p. 41-60.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-27

How to Cite

Dudézert, A., Mitev, N., & Oiry, E. (2019). Numérique et Symbolique. Systèmes d’Information Et Management (French Journal of Management Information Systems), 24(4), 3–8. Retrieved from https://revuesim.org/index.php/sim/article/view/1085

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 4 (2019)

Section

Editorial

License

The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.

It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:

  • ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
  • it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.

 

In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:

  • The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
  • The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).