Strengthening Critical Perspectives: A Call for Greater Openness in Information Systems Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66450/sim.v30i3.edKeywords:
Critical Perspectives, Frankfurt School, Emancipation, Feminism, BiasAbstract
This editorial is a call to the IS community to mobilize critical perspectives. To this end, this editorial presents the theoretical and conceptual origins of critical perspectives as well as their evolution in IS. Drawing on recent and diverse articles in the literature, the authors argue for the relevance of critical perspectives in illuminating current issues in IS.
References
Agulhon, S., Mueller, T. (2024). From housewife’s expertise to the women’s movement: Empowerment through scientific management during the Progressive Era. Organization (0). 1-26.
Arena L., Habib J., Exploring the Critical Paradigm in French MIS Research: A Trajectory from Multidisciplinarity to Autonomization (2014-2024), The Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2025.
Avgerou, C. (2008). Information systems in developing countries: A critical research review. Journal of Information Technology, 23(2), 133–146.
Bazin, Y. & Naccache, P. (2016), “The emergence of heterotopias in organization studies: an application to Social Movement Organizations”, European Management Review, 13 (3), 225-233.
Beck U. (2009) Critical theory of world risk society: a cosmopolitan vision. Constellations, 16(1), 3-22.
Clarke, R., & Davison, R. M. (2020). Research perspectives: Through whose eyes? The critical concept of the researcher perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(2), 483–501.
Fraser N. (2007), Le féminisme en mouvement, La Découverte.
Godefroid, M. E., Borghoff, V., Plattfaut, R., & Niehaves, B. (2025). Structural power imbalances in global organisations: analysing IT governance from a postcolonial perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 34(3), 529-550.
Hamet, J., & Michel, S. (2018). Du questionnement éthique dans les SI : état de l’art et proposition d’une cartographie des questions éthiques. Revue Française de Gestion, 2(271), 99-129.
Haraway, D. (2006). Manifeste Cyborg : Science, technologie et féminisme socialiste à la fin du XXe siècle. Mouvements, 4546(3), 15-21.
Hartog F. (2003/2013). Régimes d’historicité. Présentisme et expériences du temps. Éditions
Du Seuil.
Howcroft, D., & Trauth, E. M. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of critical information systems research: Theory and application. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Kant, E. (1792). Fondements de la métaphysique des mœurs. Traduit de l’Allemand en français par Victor Delbos. Les classiques des sciences sociales.
Kracaeur, S. (2012) Les employés. Aperçus de l'Allemagne nouvelle. Les Belles Lettres.
Kvasny, L., & Richardson, H. (2006). Critical research in information systems: Looking forward, looking back. Information Technology & People, 19(3), 196–202.
Lyytinen, K. J., & King, J. L. (2006). Standard making: A critical research frontier for information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 30 (Special Issue), 405–411.
Madiot, J., Doé, M., Puiseux, C., Damamme, A., Paperman, P. (2021) « Disability studies/Études critiques du handicap ». Entrée “Handicap”. Dictionnaire du genre en traduction / Dictionary of Gender in Translation / Diccionario del género en traducción. ISSN: 2967-3623.
Masiero, S. (2023). Decolonising critical information systems research: A subaltern approach. Information Systems Journal, 33(2), 299-323.
McGrath, K. (2005). Doing critical research in information systems: A case of theory and practice not informing each other. Information Systems Journal, 15(2), 85–101.
Mingers, J., & Walsham, G. (2010). Toward ethical information systems: The contribution of discourse ethics. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 833–854.
Monson, M. (2023). Socially responsible design science in information systems for sustainable development: a critical research methodology. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(2), 207-237.
Myers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in Information Systems. MISQ Discovery, 21, 1–19.
Myers, M. D., & Klein, H. K. (2011). A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS quarterly, 17-36.
Ngwenyama, O., Henriksen, H. Z., & Hardt, D. (2023). Public management challenges in the digital risk society: A critical analysis of the public debate on implementation of the Danish NemID. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(2), 108-126.
Ngwenyama, O., Rowe, F., Klein, S., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2024). The open prison of the big data revolution: false consciousness, faustian bargains, and digital entrapment. Information Systems Research, 35(4), 2030-2058.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information systems research, 2(1), 1-28.
Parthiban, R., Sun, R., Qureshi, I., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2024). Empowering rural micro-entrepreneurs through technoficing: A process model for mobilizing and developing indigenous knowledge. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 33(2), 101836.
Richardson, H., & Robinson, B. (2007). The mysterious case of the missing paradigm: a review of critical information systems research 1991–2001. Information Systems Journal, 17(3), 251-270.
Rowe, F. (2009). Les approches critiques en systèmes d’information : de la sociologie de la domination à l’éthique de l’émancipation. Acte de conférence. 10-12 juin 2009 – Marrakech, Maroc.
Rowe, F., Ngwenyama, O., & Richet, J. L. (2020). Contact-tracing apps and alienation in the age of COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(5), 545-562.
Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., & Elbanna, A. (2019). The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline. MIS quarterly, 43(3), 695-A5.
Spurk, J. (2001). Une critique de la sociologie de l’entreprise. L’hétéronomie productive de l’entreprise. Logiques sociales. L’Harmattan.
Spurk, J. (2017). Les limites de l’indignation. La révolution commence-t-elle à Bure ? Éditions du Croquant.
Stahl, B.C. (2004). Responsible Management of Information Systems. Idea Group Publishing.
Stahl, B. C. (2008). Information systems: Critical perspectives. Routledge.
Thébaud-Mony, A., Daubas-Letourneux, V., Frigul, N. & Jobin, P. (2012). Santé au travail : approches critiques. La Découverte.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.
It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:
- ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
- it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.
In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:
- The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
- The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).

