Understanding Open Source Developers' Motivations from their Participation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3917/sim.102.0071Keywords:
open source, motivations, participation, attitude, implication.Abstract
A large part of the existing literature on Open Source projects identified the motivation factors predicting the participation of members. However, these incentives do not ensure a sustained participation level. Most of the members leave projects when their personal needs are satisfied and, as a consequence, a lot of projects are aborted or abandoned before the beta version software has been distributed Indeed, most of open source projects are aborted or abandoned because failing into keeping enough active members. So, the initial aforementioned research question worth to be reversed in order to apprehend how the participation level influences the way OS projects members make sense of their own motivations. The objective of this article is to use the enactivist approach and to consider that motivations are not simple antecedents to actions but are shaped by actions as well (here the participation). The quantitative analysis delivers the results of a survey administrated to participants of business OS projects. The results reveal that reputation, reciprocity and professional opportunities expected are the most influenced variables by the participation. However, learning motivations and ideology toward OS beliefs and values are the less influenced ones. This results counterbalance prior empirical researches which had observed a strong predicting power of both variables on expected participation level of participants. This is tends to show participation as making sense to motivations whom members have practical indicators for their self-assessment.References
Ãgerfalk P.J. & Fitzgerald B.T. (2008), "Outsourcing to an unknown workforce: exploring opensourcing as a global sourcing strategy", MIS Quarterly, vol. 32, n°2, p. 385-409.
Ajzen I. (1991), "The theory of planned behavior", Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, n°2, p. 179.
Ajzen I. & Fishbein M. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
Alavi M. & Joachimathaler E.A. (1992), "Revisiting dss implementation research: a meta- analysis of the literature and suggestions for researchers.", MIS Quarterly, vol. 16, n°1, p. 95-116.
Arrow K.J. (1974), The Limits of Organization, New-York, W. W. Norton & Company.
Bagozzi R.P. & Utpal M.D. (2006), "Open source software user communities: a study of participation in linux user groups", Management Science, vol. 52, n°7, p. 1099-1115.
Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y. & Phillips L.W. (1991), "Assessing construct validity in organizational research", Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 36, n°3, p. 421-459.
Barki H. & Hartwick J. (1994), "Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude.", MIS Quarterly, vol. 18, n°1, p. 59.
Barki H. & Hartwick J. (1989), "Rethinking the concept of user involvement.", MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, n°1, p. 52.
Barki H. & Hartwick J. (1994), "User participation, conflict, and conflict resolution: the mediating roles of influence", Information Systems Research, vol. 5, n°4, p. 422-438.
Bateson G. (1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind, New York, Ballantine.
Benbya H., Belbaly N.A. & Meissonier R. (2007), "Etude empirique sur le comportement des développeurs et son impact sur le développement de logiciels open source". Dans Actes de la conférence de l'Association Information et Management.
Bentler P.M. (1990), "Comparative fit indexes in structural equation models", Psychological Bulletin, vol. 107, n°2, p. 238-246.
Blau P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, New-York, Wiley.
Bonaccorsi A. & Rossi C. (2003), "Why open source software can succeed", Research Policy, vol. 32, n°7, p. 1243.
Bright A.D. (2003), "A within-subjects/multiple behavior alternative application of the theory of reasoned action: a case study of preferences for recreation facility development", Leisure Sciences, vol. 25, n°4, p. 327-331.
Bromley D.B. (1993), Reputation, Image and Impression Management, New York, Wiley.
Brown J.S. & Duguid P. (1991), "Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation". Dans E. L. Lesser, M. A. Fontaine, & J. A. Slusher, éd. Knowledge and communities. Oxford, Butterworth Heinemann.
Brown J.S. & Duguid P. (2000), The Social Life of Information, Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
Compeau D. & Higgins C.A. (1999), "Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study.", MIS Quarterly, vol. 23, n°2, p. 145.
Conner M., Warren R., Close S. & Sparks P. (1999), "Alcohol consumption and the theory of planned behavior: an examination of the cognitive mediation of past behavior", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 8, p. 1676-1704.
Cordano M. & Frieze I.H. (2000), "Pollution reduction preferences of u.s. environmental managers: applying ajzen's theory of planned behavior", Academy of Management Journal, vol. 43, n°4, p. 627-641.
Crowston K., Howison J. & Annabi H. (2006), "Information systems success in free and open source software development: theory and measures", Software Process: Improvement and Practice, vol. 11, n°2, p. 123-148.
Dahlander L. & Magnusson M.G. (2005), "Relationships between open source software companies and communities: observations from nordic firms", Research Policy, vol. 34, n°4, p. 481-493.
Dahlander L. & Wallin M.W. (2006), "A man on the inside: unlocking communities as complementary assets", Research Policy, vol. 35, n°8, p. 1243-1259.
Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P. & Warshaw P.R. (1989), "User acceptance of computer-technology - a comparison of two theoretical-models", Management Science, vol. 35, n°8, p. 982-1003.
Deci E.L. (1971), "Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 18, p. 105-115.
Deci E.L. & Ryan R.M. (2000), "The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior", Psychology Inquiry, vol. 11, n°4, p. 227–268.
Demazière D., Horn F. & Jullien N. (2006), "How free software developers work: the mobilization of 'distant communities'", SSRN eLibrary. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1301572 [Accédé Mars 29, 2010].
Diener C.I. & Dweck C.S. (1978), "An analysis of helplessness: continuous changes in performance, strategy and achievement cognitions following failure", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 36, p. 451-462.
Diener C.I. & Dweck C.S. (1980), "An analysis of learned helplessness ii. the processing of success", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 39, p. 940-952.
van Dijk T.A. (1995), "Ideological discourse analysis", New Courant, vol. 16, n°5, p. 135-161.
Dweck C.S. (1990), Self-Theories and Goals: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press.
Dweck C.S. & Elliott E.S. (1983), "Achievement motivation". Dans P. Mussen & M. Hetherington, éd. Handbook of child psychology. New York, John Wiley.
Dweck C.S. & Leggett E.L. (1988), "A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality", Psychological Review, vol. 95, n°2, p. 256-273.
Elliott E.S. & Dweck C.S. (1988), "Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 54, n°1, p. 5-12.
Elliott M.S. & Scacchi W. (2004), "Mobilization of software developers: the free software movement", Working paper, University of California, Irvine, CA.
Fang Y. & Neufeld D. (2009), "Understanding sustained participation in open source software projects.", Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 25, n°4, p. 9-50.
Feldman R.H.L. & Mayhew P.C.T. (1984), "Predicting nutrition behavior the utilization of a social psychological model of health behavior", Basic & Applied Social Psychology, vol. 5, n°3, p. 183-195.
Fischhoff B. (1982), "Debiasing". Dans D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky, éd. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Fitzgerald B. (2006), "The transformation of open source software", MIS Quarterly, vol. 30, n°3, p. 587-598.
Fornell C. & Larcker D. (1981), "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error", Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, p. 39-50.
Gacek C. & Arief B. (2004), "The many meanings of open source", IEEE Software, vol. 21, n°1.
Gosain S. (2003), "Looking through a window on open source culture: lessons for community infrastructure design", Systèmes d’Information et Management, vol. 8, n°1.
Gray P.H. & Meister D.B. (2004), "Knowledge sourcing effectiveness", Management Science, vol. 50, n°6, p. 821-834.
Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L. & Black W.C. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.
Hann I., Roberts J., Slaughter S. & Fielding R. (2004), "Economic incentives for participating in open source software projects".
Hemetsberger A. & Reinhardt C. (2006), "Learning and knowledge-building in communities", Management Learning, vol. 37, n°2, p. 187-214.
Hunt F. & Johnson P. (2002), "On the pareto distribution of open source projects". Dans Newcastle.
Jaisingh J., See-To E.W.K. & Tam K.Y. (2008), "The impact of open source software on the strategic choices of firms developing proprietary software.", Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 25, n°3, p. 241-275.
Katz J. (1985), "The role of behavioral intentions in the prediction of behavior", Journal of Social Psychology; Apr85, Vol. 125 Issue 2, p149, 7p, vol. 125, n°2, p. 149-156.
Kogut B. & Metiu A. (2001), "Open source software development and distributed innovation", Oxford Review Economy Policy, vol. 17, n°2.
Kolb D.A. (1984), Experiential Learning, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
Koslowsky M., Kluger A.N. & Yinon Y.T. (1988), "Predicting behavior combining intention with investment", Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 73, n°1, p. 102-106.
Kraus G. (1973), "Confusion about diffusion", New Diffusionist, vol. 3, n°13, p. 189-195.
Lakhani K. & Von Hippel E. (2003), "How open source software works: free user-to-user assistance", Research Policy, vol. 32, n°6, p. 923-943.
Lakhani K., Wolf B.J. & Feller (2005), "Why hackers do what they do: understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects". Dans J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, & K. Lakhani, éd. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software. Boston, MIT Press.
Lerner J. & Tirole J. (2002), "Some simple economics of the open source", The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 2, p. 197-234.
Lerner J. & Tirole J. (2000), The Simple Economics of Open Source, Working paper, Department of Economics, Harvard University.
Lin N. (2001), Social Capital, Cambridge University Press.
Ljungberg J. (2000), "Open source movements as a model for organising", European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 9, p. 208-216.
Maison D., Greenwald A.G. & Bruin R.H. (2004), "Predictive validity of the implicit association test in studies of brands, consumer attitudes, and behavior", Journal of Consumer Psychology, vol. 14, n°4, p. 405-415.
Maturana H. (1987), "Everything said is said by an observer". Dans Gaia: a way of knowing. Lindisfarne Press, p. 65-82.
Maturana H. & Varela F. (1992), The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Boston & London, Shamabala.
McLure Wasko M. & Faraj S. (2005), "Why should i share? examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice.", MIS Quarterly, vol. 29, n°1, p. 35-57.
Monroe K.R. (1996), The Heart of Altruism, Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
Nahapiet J. & Ghoshal S. (1998), "Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage", Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, n°2, p. 242-266.
Pavlou P.A. & Fygenson M. (2006), "Understanding and prediction electronic commerce adoption: an extension of the theory of planned behavior", MIS Quarterly, vol. 30, n°1, p. 115-143.
Powers W.T. (1973), Behavior: The Control of Perception, Chicago, Aldine.
Raghu T.S., Sinha R., Vinze A. & Burton O. (2009), "Willingness to pay in an open source software environment.", Information Systems Research, vol. 20, n°2, p. 218-236.
Raymond E.S. (1999), The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary, Sebastopol, O’Reilly and Associates.
Raymond L. (2000), "A la conquête de la noosphère". Dans O. Blondeau & F. Latrive, éd. Libres enfants du savoir numérique. Premier Secours. Broché.
Roberts J., Hann I. & Slaughter S. (2006), "Understanding the motivations participation and performance of open source software developers a. longitudinal study of the apache projects", Management Science, vol. 52, n°7, p. 984.
Rossi C. & Bonaccorsi A. (2006), "Intrinsic motivations and profit-oriented firms in open source software. do firms practice what they preach?". Dans J. Bitzer, éd. The Economics of Open Source Software Development : Analyzing Motivation, Organization, Innovation & Competitions in theOpen Source Software Revolution. Amsterdam, Netherland, Elsevier, p. 83-110.
Roussel P. & Wacheux F. (2005), Management Des Ressources Humaines Méthodes De Recherche En Sciences Humaines Et Sociales, De Boeck. Available at: http://www.librairiedialogues.fr/livre/223571-management-des-ressources-humaines-methodes-de-recherche--sous-la-dir-de-patrice-roussel-et-frederic-wacheux-de-boeck [Accédé Mars 29, 2010].
Scacchi W. (2006), "Understanding the requirements for developing open source software systems", IEEE Proceedings Software, vol. 149, n°1, p. 24-39.
Scarbrough E. (1990), "Attitudes, social representations, and ideology". Dans C. Fraser & G. Gaskell, éd. The Social Psychology of Widespread Beliefs. Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 99-117.
Shah S.K. (2006), "Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development.", Management Science, vol. 52, n°7, p. 1000-1014.
Shapiro D., Sheppard B. & Cheraskin L. (1992), "Business on an handshake", Negotiation Journal, vol. 8, n°4, p. 365-377.
Shumaker S. & Brownell A. (1984), "Toward a theory of social support: closing conceptual gaps", Journal of Social Issues, vol. 40, n°4, p. 11-36.
Smircich L. & Stubbart C. (1985), "Strategic management in an enacted world.", Academy of Management Review, vol. 10, n°4, p. 724-736.
Soenen G. (2006), "Les déterminants du fonctionnement communautaire. une étude comparative", Revue Française de Gestion, vol. 32, n°163, p. 139-153.
Steiger J.H. & Lind J.C. (1980), ". statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. paper presented at the congrès annuel de la psychometric society, iowa city (io).". Dans Congrès annuel de la Psychometric Society. Iowa City, USA.
Stewart G., Milford M., Jewels T., Hunter T. & Hunter B. (2000), "Organisational readiness for erp implementation",
Stewart K.J. & Gosain S. (2006), "The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams", MIS Quarterly, vol. 30, n°2, p. 291-314.
Tajfel H. (1972), "Experiments in a vacuum". Dans J. I. &. H. Tajfel, éd. The context of social psychology. London, Academic Press.
Taylor J.R. & Van Every J. (2000), The Emergent Organization: Communication as Its Site and Surface, Mahwah, New Jersey, Erlbaum.
Taylor S. & Todd P.A. (1995), "Understanding information technology usage - a test of competing models", Information Systems Research, vol. 6, n°2, p. 144-176.
Tubbs M.E. & Ekeberg S.E. (1991), "The role of intentions in work motivation: implications for goal-setting theory and research", Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, n°1, p. 180.
Tucker L.R. & Lewis C. (1973), "The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis", Psychometrika, vol. 38, p. 1-10.
Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B. & Davis F.D. (2003), "User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view.", MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, n°3, p. 425-478.
Von Hippel E. & Von Krogh G. (2003), "Open source software and the private-collective innovation model", Organisation Science, vol. 14, n°2, p. 209-223.
Von Krogh G. (2003), "Open-source software development", MIT Sloan Management Review.
Von Krogh G. & Von Hippel E. (2006), "The promise of research on open source software", Management Science, vol. 52, n°7, p. 975-983.
Vroom D.J. & Jago A.G. (1998), The New Leadership. Managing Participation in Organizations, Prentice Hall.
Weick K.E. (1988), "Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations", Journal of Management Studies, vol. 25, n°4, p. 305-317.
Weick K.E., Sutcliffe K.M. & Obstfeld D. (2005), "Organizing and the process of sensemaking.", Organization Science, vol. 16, n°4, p. 409-421.
Wicker A.W. (1969), "Attitudes versus actions: the relationship of verbal and overt behavioural responses to attitude objects", Journal of Social Issues, vol. 25, p. 41-78.
Wixom B.H. & Todd P.A. (2005), "A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance", Information Systems Research, vol. 16, n°1, p. 85-102.
Ye Y., Nakajoki K., Yamamoto Y. & Kishida K. (2004), "The co-evolution of systems and communities in free and open source software development". Dans S. Koch, éd. Free/Open Source Software Development. Hershey, Idea Group Publishing.
Zhao L. & Deek F. (2004), "User collaboration in open source software development", Electronic Markets, vol. 14, n°2, p. 89-103.
Zimmerman J.B., Foray D. & Thoron S. (2007), "Open software: knowledge openness and cooperation in cyberspace". Dans E. Brousseau & N. Curien, éd. Internet and Digital Economics; Principles, Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, p. 368-390.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.
It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:
- ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
- it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.
In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:
- The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
- The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).
