How combine market and non-market: an empirical taxonomy of OSSC’ strategic behaviors

Authors

  • Khaireddine Mouakhar Ecole de Management de Normandie Laboratoire Métis 30 rue Richelieu 76600 Le Havre
  • Albéric Tellier Université de Caen Basse-Normandie IAE de Caen, laboratoire NIMEC 3 rue Claude Bloch, BP 5160, 14075 Caen Cedex

Keywords:

Marchand, non marchand, stratégie hybride, idéologie, open source

Abstract

The aim of this article is to better understand how service companies, which were initially non-profit organizations, can develop a commercial activity in open source software. From a theoretical point of view, the strategic behavior of firms is influenced by social rules to which they must, at least partially, comply in order to seem legitimate. At the methodological level, this research builds on the work of Lisein et al. (2009) who have identified four key dimensions in the ideology of the OSS.

A quantitative study on a sample of 71 Open Source Software Companies (OSSC) allows highlighting three strategic behaviors. Two of them represent hybridization strategies, while the third is much closer to a strict commercial logic. Then, the qualitative study of three cases of OSSC, that were previously sampled, were used to better understand the benefits that these companies expect from interacting with the non-commercial sphere and the strategic maneuvers they deploy.

Our results confirm that OSSC are positioning themselves on the four generic principles constituting the ideology of OSS. Therefore Lisein et al. (2009) Model seems validated. However, our observations show that it is possible to combine market and non-market logics with different behaviors. These behaviors are distinguished on three key dimensions: the discussions with the open source community relationship, the type of legitimacy sought, the strategic maneuvers deployed. This research may well be of particular interest to managers of OSSC to better understand the consequences and implications of their strategic positioning choices between market and non-market sphere.

 

Author Biographies

Khaireddine Mouakhar, Ecole de Management de Normandie Laboratoire Métis 30 rue Richelieu 76600 Le Havre

Professeur en finance d'entreprise

Albéric Tellier, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie IAE de Caen, laboratoire NIMEC 3 rue Claude Bloch, BP 5160, 14075 Caen Cedex

Maître de Conférences,

Habilité à diriger des recherches

References

Archambault, J.P. (2003), « Coopération ou concurrence? » Médialog, n°48, décembre, p. 40-43.

Baechler, J., (1976), Qu'est-ce que l'idéologie ?, Gallimard, Paris.

Bardin, L. (1993), L’analyse de contenu, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

Batikas, M., Miralles, F. (2008), “Firms' Decision to Contribute to Free Libre Open Source Software Communities”, ECIS Proceeding, n°175.

Baum, J.A.C., Oliver, C. (1991), “Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.36, n°2, p. 187-218.

Benkeltoum, N. (2009), « Les régimes de L'open Source : solidarité, innovation et modèles d'affaires », Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion, Centre de Gestion Scientifique, Mines ParisTech.

Benkeltoum, N. (2011), « Regards sur les stratégies de détournement dans l'industrie open source », Vie & sciences de l'entreprise, n°187, p. 72-94.

Bonaccorsi, A., Giannangeli, S., Rossi, C. (2006), “Entry Strategies Under Competing Standards: Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry”, Management Science, Vol. 52, n°7, p. 1085–1098.

Butler, B. (2001), “Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-based Model of Online Social Structures”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 12, n°4, p. 346–362.

Child, J., Tsai, T. (2005), “The Dynamic between Firms’ Environmental Strategies and Institutional Constraints in Emerging Economies: Evidence from China and Taiwan”, Journal of Management Studies Vol. 42, p. 95-126.

Coris, M. (2006), « Chronique d’une absorption par la sphère marchande : les Sociétés de Services en Logiciels Libres », Gérer et Comprendre, n°84, p. 12-23.

Dahlander, L., Magnusson, M. (2005), “Relationships between Open Source Software Companies and Communities: Observations from Nordic Firms”, Research Policy, Vol. 34, n°4, p. 481-493.

Dahlander, L., Wallin, M. W. (2006), “A Man on the Inside: Unlocking Communities as Complementary Assets”, Research Policy, Vol. 35, n°8, p. 1243-1259.

Dauphin, F. (2008), « Les logiciels libres : généalogie et idéologies d’un mouvement social », Revista Logos, Comunicaçao e Universidade, Ano XV, nº29, 2ème semestre, p. 71-85.

Di Maggio, P.J., Powell, W.W. (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, n°2, p. 147-160.

Garcia, J.M., Steinmueller, W.E. (2003), “The Open Source Way of Working: a New Paradigm for the Division of Labour in Software Development?”, INK Research Working Paper, SPRU, 1, University of Sussex.

Hertel, G., Nierder, S., Hermann, S. (2003), “Motivation of Software Developers in Open Source Projects: an Internet-Based Survey of Contributors to the Linux Kernel”, Research Policy, Vol. 32, n°7, p. 1159-1177.

Himanen, P. (2001), « L’Éthique hacker et l’esprit de l’ère de l’information », Exils Essais, New York.

Hlady Rispal, M. (2002), La méthode des cas : Application à la recherche en gestion. Bruxelles : De Boeck.

Jullien, N. (2007), « Développer du logiciel libre, une activité marchande ! », Cahier de recherche du M@rsouin, n°14, Octobre.

Jullien, N., Roudaut, K. (2012), « Can Open Source Projetcs Succeed when the Producers are not Users ? Lessons from the data Processing Field”, Management International, Vol.16, p. 113-127.

Jullien N., Zimmermann, J.B. (2011), “Floss firms, users and communities: a viable match?”, Journal of Innovation Economics, Vol. 1 n°7, p. 31-53.

Laifi, A. (2012), « De la légitimité d'un business model innovant. Cas de la bibliothèque numérique Cyberlibris », Revue française de gestion, Vol. 4, n°223, p. 75-89.

Lerner, J., Tirole, J. (2001), " The Open Source Movement: Key Research Questions ", European Economic Review, Vol. 45, n°4, p. 819-826.

Lisein, O., Pichault, F., Desmecht, J. (2009), « Les business models des sociétés de services actives dans le secteur open source », Systèmes d’Information et Management, Vol. 14, n°2, p. 7-40.

Loilier, T. (2002), « Gestion de l’innovation : quels enseignements tirer du cas des logiciels libres ? », Finance-Contrôle-Stratégie, Vol. 5, n°:3, p. 141-168.

Malhotra, N., Decaudin, J.M., Bouguerra, A. (2007), « Études marketing avec SPSS. Chapitre 8 : analyse typologique », 5ème édition, Pearson Educaton, Paris.

Markus, M.L., Manville, B., Agres, E.C. (2000), “What Makes a Virtual Organization Work?”, Sloan Management Review, Vol.42, n°1, p.13-26.

Meissonier, R., Houze, E., Chometon, P. (2008), « Application du modèle de la capacité d'absorption de l'entreprise à l'open source 2.0 : étude de cas d'une SSII suisse », Conférence de l’AIM, -Workshop ICIS, Décembre, Paris.

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. (1991), Analyse des données qualitatives, recueil de nouvelles méthodes, De Boeck Université, Bruxelles.

Moon, J.Y., Sproull, L. (2000), “Essence of Distributed Work: the Case of the Linux Kernel”, First Monday, Vol.5, n°11.

Muselli, L. (2008), « Le rôle des licences dans les modèles économiques des éditeurs de logiciels open source », Revue française de gestion, n°181, p. 199-214.

Muselli, L., Tywoniak, S. (2012), “From not-for-profit to profit: The case of Free/Open Source Software”, 28th EGOS Colloquium, Helsinki.

North, D. C. (2005), “Understanding The Process of Economic Change”, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Oh, W., Jeon, S. (2007), “Membership Herding and Network Stability in the Open Source Community: The Ising Perspective”, Management Science, Vol. 53, n°7, p. 1086-1101.

Oliver, C. (1991), “Strategic Response to Institutional Processes”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, n°1, p. 145-179.

Osterloh, M., Kuster, B., Rota, S. (2003), “Trust and Commerce in Open Source – a Contradiction?”, in Trust in the Network Economy, O. Petrovic, R. Posch and F. Marhold (Eds.), Springer Verlag, Vien, p. 129-141.

Peng, M.W., Sun, S.L., Pinkham, B., Chen, H. (2009), “The Institution-based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod”, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 23, n°4, p. 63-81.

Raymond, E.S. (1999), “The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary”, O’Reilly and Associates, Sebastopol.

Reynaud, J.D (1989), « L'action collective et la régulation sociale », Armand Colin, Paris.

Reynaud, J.D. (1995), Le conflit, la négociation et la règle, Octares édition, Paris.

Rocher, G. (1970), Introduction à la sociologie générale, Tome 1 : l'action sociale, Seuil, collection Points Essais, Paris.

Royer, I., Zarlowski, P. (1999), « Le design de la recherche », in Méthodes de recherches en management, R.A. Thiétart (Dir.), Dunod, Paris, p. 138-168.

Suchman, M.C. (1995), “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, n°3, p.571-610.

Tayon, J. (2002), « Le projet Linux est-il un modèle possible d’entreprise innovante? » Working Paper, v.1.20, CNAM, Chaire Développement des systèmes d’organisation.

Trouinard, A. (2006), « Les effets de l’arrivée de nouveaux concurrents dans un champ fortement institutionnalisé : le cas de la Presse Quotidienne Parisienne », in Stratégies collectives – Rivaliser et Coopérer avec ses concurrents, S. Yami et F. Le Roy (Eds.), EMS, Colombelles, p. 195-219.

Von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S. (2003), Collective Action and Communal Resources in Open Source Software Development: The Case of Freenet, Switzerland: Institute of Management University of St. Gallen, p.1-42.

Weber, R.P. (1990), Basic Content Analysis, Sage, Newbury Park.

Downloads

Published

2013-09-29

How to Cite

Mouakhar, K., & Tellier, A. (2013). How combine market and non-market: an empirical taxonomy of OSSC’ strategic behaviors. Systèmes d’Information Et Management (French Journal of Management Information Systems), 18(3). Retrieved from https://revuesim.org/index.php/sim/article/view/506

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 3 (2013)

Section

Empirical research

License

The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.

It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:

  • ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
  • it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.

 

In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:

  • The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
  • The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).