Le management amont et aval des droits de propriété intellectuelle au sein des écosystèmes-plateformes naissants
Keywords:
Platform ecosystem, intellectual property rights, open innovation, knowledge creation, NFC platform.Abstract
This research underlines the role of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) to manage knowl- edge in the development of complex systems such as platform-ecosystems without an orches- trator actor. These ecosystems are straightaway registered in an inter-organizational inno- vation model around a ‘core’ platform which structures their existences. Thanks to Nice Futur Campus (NFCampus) case study, the paper shows how the upstream and down- stream management of IPR contributes to the emergence of Near Field Communication (NFC) platform-ecosystem. It also proposes several theoretical contributions both on the ris- ing ecosystems and on the open innovation literature. These contributions concern the structuring role of IPR in the birth of an ecosystem, the articulation between tacit and ex- plicit knowledge and the open degree of the technological platform. The paper highlights be- sides practitioners and local public actors on the way IPR may favour or slow down the in- dustrialization of numerous current experimentations in NFC domain, or more generally on how IPR management contributes to the success deployment of innovation emanating from a platform-ecosystem without an orchestrator actor.
References
Attour A., Della Peruta M. (2014), “Archi- tectural Knowledge: key flows and pro- cesses in designing an inter-organization- al technological platform”, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, forth- coming.
Attour A., Rallet A. (2014), “ Le rôle des ter- ritoires dans le développement des sys- tèmes trans-sectoriels d’innovation lo- caux : le cas des smart cities”, Innovations, n°43, p. 253-279.
Ayerbe C., Missonier A. (2007), Validité in- terne et validité externe de l’étude de cas : principes et mise en œuvre pour un renforcement mutuel », Finance Contrôle Stratégie, vol. 10, n°2, p. 37-62.
Ayerbe C., Azzam J. (2015), “Pratiques co- opétitives dans l’Open Innovation : les enseignements des patents pools”, Ma- nagement International, vol. 19, n°2, p. 95-114.
Baldwin C., Clark K. (2000), The power of modularity, MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.
Baldwin C., Woodward J. (2009), “The ar- chitecture of platforms: a unified view”, in Platforms, Markets and Innovation, A. Gawer (ed.), Edward Elgar, London, UK, p.19-44.
Basole R.C., Rouse W.B. (2008), “Complex- ity of service value networks: conceptu- alization and empirical investigation”, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 47, n°1, p. 53- 70.
Basole R.C., (2009), “Visualization of inter- firm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem”, Journal of Information Technology, vol. 24, n°2, p. 144-159.
Benbya H., Meissonier R. (2007), “La contribution des Systèmes de Gestion des Connaissances au développement de nouveaux produits : étude de cas d’une entreprise du secteur de l’industrie aéro- nautique”, Systèmes d’Information et Ma- nagement, vol. 12, n°1, p. 75-95.
Bennett R.H., Anthony W.P. (2001), “ Un- derstanding the role of intuition-tacit knowledge and analysis-explicit knowl- edge in bank deliberations”, in: T.H. Lant et Z. Shapira (eds.), Organizational Cog- nition: Computation and interpretation, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, p.185-209.
Boudreau K. (2010), “Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Ac- cess vs. Devolving Control”, Manage- ment Science, vol. 56, n°10, p. 1849- 1872.
Boudreau K., Lakhani K. (2009), “How to Manage Outside Innovation: Competitive Markets or Collaborative Communities?”,
SYSTÈMES D’INFORMATION ET MANAGEMENT
MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 50, n°4, p. 69-75.
Chanal V., Lesca H., Martinet A.C. (1997), “Vers une ingénierie de la recherche en sciences de gestion”, Revue Française de Gestion, n°116, p. 41-51.
Chesbrough H. (2003), Open Innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business School Press.
Chesbrough H. (2006), Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Inno- vation Landscape, Boston: Harvard Busi- ness School Press.
Chesbrough H., Bogers M. (2014), “Expli- cating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding in- novation”, in: Chesbrough, H., Vanhaver- beke,W., West, J. (Eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford University Press,Oxford.
Cohendet P., Pénin J. (2011), “Patents to exclude versus include : Rethinking the management of intellectual property rights in a knowledge-based economy”, Technology Innovation Management Re- view, December, p. 12-17.
Cohen M.D., Bacdayan P. (1994), “Organi- zational routines are stored as procedu- ral memory: evidence from a laboratory study”, Organization Science, vol. 5, n°4, p. 554-568.
Dahlander L., Gann D.M. (2010), “How open is innovation?”, Research Policy, vol. 39, p. 699–709.
David A. (2000), “Logique, épistémologie et méthodologie en sciences de gestion : trois hypothèses revisitées”, in Les nou- velles fondations des sciences de gestion – Eléments d’épistémologie de la re- cherche en management, A. David, A. Hatchuel, R. Laufer (eds.), Vuibert, Paris, p. 83-110.
De Vogeleer E., Lescop D. (2011), “Plate- formes, coordination et incitations”, Ma- nagement & Avenir, n°46, p. 200-218.
Edouard S., Gratacap A. (2011), “ Proposi- tion d’un modèle d’intelligence collective pour les écosystèmes d’affaires ”, Mana- gement & Avenir, vol. 6, n°46, p.177-199.
Egelhoff W.G. (1982), “Strategy and struc- ture in multinational corporations – an information processing approach”, Ad- ministrative Science Quarterly, vol. 27, n°3, pp. 435-458.
Eisenhardt K.M. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 14, n°4, p. 532-550.
Eisenhardt K.M., Graebener M.E. (2007), “Theory building from cases: opportuni- ties and challenges”, Academy of Man- agement Journal, vol. 50, n°1, p.25-32.
Enkel E., Gassmann O., Chesbrough H. (2009), “Open R&D and open innova- tion: exploring the phenomenon”, R&D Management, vol. 39, n°4, p. 311–316.
Gassmann O., Bader M.A. (2006), “Intellec- tual Property Management in Inter-firm R&D Collaborations ”, Taiwan Academy of Management Journal, vol. 6, n°2, p. 217-236.
Gassmann O., Enkel E. (2004), “Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes”, Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, July 6-9.
Gawer A. (2009), “Platforms dynamics and strategies: From products to services”, in Platforms, Markets and Innovation, A. Gawer (ed.), p. 45-76.
Gawer A. (2010), “Towards a general theo- ry of technological platforms”, DUID Summer Conference 2010, London, 16- 18 june, 40 pages.
Gawer A., Cusumano M.A. (2002), “Plat- form leadership : How Intel, Microsoft
LE MANAGEMENT AMONT ET AVAL DES DROITS DE PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE AU SEIN DES ÉCOSYSTÈMES...
and Cisco drived industry innovation”, Harvard Business School Press.
Gawer A., Cusumano M.A. (2010a), “How firms become platform leaders ”, MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 49, n°2, p. 28-35.
Gawer A., Cusumano M.A. (2010b), “The organization of technological platforms”, Research in the Sociology of Organiza- tions, vol. 29, p. 287-296.
Gawer A., Cusumano M.A. (2012), “Indus- try platforms and ecosystem innovation”, DRUID 2012. CBS, Copenhagen, Den- mark.
Geertz C. (1973), “Thick Description: To- ward an Interpretative Theory of Cul- ture”, in Geertz C., The Interpretation of Cultures, New-York: Bas Books, p. 3-30.
Gobo C. (2004), “ Sampling, Representa- tiveness and Generalizability”, in Seale C., Gobo G., Gubrium J. et Silverman D., Qualitative Research Practice, Sage Pub- lications.
Gobble M.A. (2012), “Defining Open”, Re- search-Technology Management, July- August, p. 58-60.
Gomm R., Hammersley M., Foster P. (2000), Case study method: key issues, key texts. Sage, London.
Evers C.W., Wu E.H. (2006), “ On General- ising from Single Case Studies : Episte- mological Reflections”, Journal of Philos- ophy of Education, vol. 40, n°4, 511-526.
Habib J. (2010), “La dynamique de création de connaissances dans les processus d’innovation : Analyse comparée de quatre études de cas dans le secteur de la santé électronique”, Systèmes d’Infor- mation et Management, vol. 15, n°4, p. 93-140.
Hagedoorn, J. (2003), “Sharing intellectual property rights - an exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies”, In-
dustrial and Corporate Change, vol. 12, n°5, p. 1035-1050.
Henkel J., Baldwin C., Y, ShiH W. (2013), “IP modularity: profiting from innovation by aligning product architecture with in- tellectual property”, California Manage- ment Review, vol. 55, n°4, p.65-82.
Huizingh E.K.R.E. (2011), “Open innova- tion: state of art and future perspectives”, Technovation, vol. 31, p. 2–9.
Iansiti M., Levien R. (2004), The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability, HBS Press, Boston.
Isckia T. (2011), “ Ecosystème d’affaires, stratégies de plateforme et innovation ouverte : vers une approche intégrée de la dynamique d’innovation”, Manage- ment & Avenir, vol. 6, n°46, p. 157-176.
Isckia T., Lescop D. (2013), “Platform- based Ecosystems: Leveraging Network Centric Innovation”, in Understanding Business Ecosystems: How Firms Succeed in the New World of Convergence, S. Ben Letaïfa, A. Gratacap and T. Isckia (eds),De Boeck, p. 97-111.
Janicot C., Mignon S. (2008), “ Vers un mo- dèle de codification des connaissances : nature et perspectives”, Systèmes d’Infor- mation et Management, vol. 13, n°4, p. 1-31.
Khalil C., Dudezert A. (2014), “Entre auto- nomie et contrôle : quelle régulation pour les systèmes de gestion des connaissances ?”, Systèmes d’Information et Management, vol. 19, n°1, p.51-76.
Koenig G. (2012), “Le concept d’écosystè- me d’affaires revisité”, M@n@gement, vol. 15, n°2, p. 208-224.
Laursen K., Salter A.J.,(2004), “Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation ?”,
SYSTÈMES D’INFORMATION ET MANAGEMENT
Research Policy, vol. 33, n°8, p. 1201- 1215.
Leten B., Vanhaverbeke W., Roijakkers N., Clerix A., Van Helleputte J. (2013), “IP models to orechestrate innovation ecosystems: IMEC, a public research in- stitute in nano-electronics”, California management review, vol. 55, n°4, p.51- 64.
Lessig L. (2001), The Future of Ideas, Vin- tage Books, New York.
Lessig L. (2004), Free Culture: The nature and future of creativity, Penguin books.
Loilier T., Malherbe M. (2013), “Experimen- tation and the development of eco-sys- temic competencies in the field of con- tactless mobile services”, in Understanding business ecosystems, S. Ben Letaifa (ed.), De Boeck, Paris, p.193- 207.
Merminod V., “TIC, partage de connais- sances et fiabilité du développement de produit distribué : une approche par le “glitch” au sein du Groupe SEB”, Sys- tèmes d’Information et Management, vol.12, n°1, p. 11-38.
Musca G. (2006), Une stratégie de re- cherche processuelle : l’étude longitudi- nale de cas enchâssés, M@n@gement, vol. 9, n°3, p.145-168.
Nonaka I. (1994), “A dynamic theory of or- ganizational knowledge creation”, Orga- nization Science, vol.5, n°1, p.14-37.
Nonaka I., Takeuchi. H. (1995), The knowl- edge-creation company: how japanese companies create the dynamics of inno- vation, Oxford Universuty Press, New York.
Parker G., Van Alstyne M. (2013), “Innova- tion, Openness and platform control”, SSRN.com working paper.
Pastorelly N., Benouali H., Leblanc C., Mi- randa S., Attour A. (2011), « Nice Futur Campus, un bouquet de services NFC
dans une carte virtuelle étudiant », RTSI- Ingénierie des systèmes d’information, vol.16, n°04, p.63-86.
Pénin J., Wack J.P. (2008), “Research tool patents and free-libre biotechnoloy : a suggested unified framework ”, Research Policy, n°37, p.1909-1921.
Pénin J. (2013), “Are you open ? An inves- tigation of the concept of openness for the knowledge and innovation ?”, Revue Economique, n°64, p.133-148.
Pénin J. (2010a), « Quelle politique de li- cence de brevet pour les organismes pu- blics de recherche », Management Inter- national, vol. 14, n°3, p. 47-59.
Pénin J. (2010b), « Le problème des « patent trolls » : comment limiter la spéculation sur la propriété intellectuelle dans une économie fondée sur les connaissances ? », Innovations, n°32, p. 35-53.
Pénin J., Burger-Helmchen T., Dintrich A., Guittard C., Schenk E. (2013), L’innova- tion ouverte Définition, pratiques et pers- pectives, Prospectives et entreprise, Eclai- rage sur les entreprises dans un monde ouvert, CCI Paris Ile-de-France.
Rayna T., Striukova L., (2010), “ Large-Scale Open Innovation: Open Source vs. Pa- tent Pools”, International Journal of Technology Management, n°3-4, p.477- 496.
Rey P., Salan D. (2008), “Abuse of domi- nance and licensing of intellectual prop- erty”, MPRA Paper 9454, University li- brary of Munich, Germany.
Reix R. (1995), “Savoir tacite et savoir for- malisé dans l’entreprise”, Revue Françai- se de Getsion, n° 105, septembre-octobre, p.17-28.
Rochet J.C., Tirole J. (2006), “Two-Sided Market: a progress report”, The Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 3, n°35, p. 645-667.
LE MANAGEMENT AMONT ET AVAL DES DROITS DE PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE AU SEIN DES ÉCOSYSTÈMES...
Saad I., Grundstein M., Rosenthal-Sabroux C. (2009), “Une méthode d’aide à l’iden- tification des connaissances cruciales de l’entreprise”, Systèmes d’Information et Management, n°3, vol. 14, p.43-76.
Saglietto L. (2007), “De la place des marchés électroniques à l’EA d’affaires : le cas des systèmes de réservations aériennes et tou- ristiques”, Système d’information et ma- nagement, vol. 12, n°3, p.77-94.
Simcoe, T.S., Graham S.H.J., Fledman M.P. (2009), “Competing on Standards? En- trepreneurship, Intellectual Property, and Platform Technologies”, Journal of Eco- nomics & Management Strategy, vol. 18, n°3, p. 775-816.
Spender P.M. (1993), “Competitive advan- tage from tacit knowledge: unpacking the concept and its strategic implica- tions”, proceedings de l’Academy of Man- agement Annual Meeting, Atlanta, 8 août.
Stake R.E., (1995), The Art of Case Study Research., Sage Publications, London.
Tushman M.L., Nadler D.A. (1978), “Infor- mation processing as an integrating con-
cept in organization design”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 3, n°3, p. 613- 624.
Van de Ven A.H., Huber G.P. (1990), “Lon- gitudinal field research methods for studying processes of organizational change”, Organization Science, vol. 1, n°3, p. 213-219.
Van de Vrande V., Vanhaverbeke W., Grassmann O. (2010), “Broadening the scope of open innovation: past research, current state and future directions“, Inter- national Journal of Technology Manage- ment, vol. 52, n°3/4, p. 221-235.
West J., Salter A., Vanhaverbeke W., Ches- brough H. (2014), “Open Innovation: The next decade”, Research Policy, n°43, p. 805-811.
Yin R.L. (2003), Application of Case Study Research, Applied Social Research Series, Second Edition, Sage Publications.
Les Echos, dossier spécial propriété indus- trielle et intellectuelle, “NFC, les brevets de la discorde”, vendredi 12 et samedi 13 juin 2015.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.
It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:
- ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
- it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.
In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:
- The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
- The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).
