L'influence des caractéristiques professionnelles sur la consultation d'un SGC et la capitalisation : le cas des métiers d'auditeur, d'avocat et de consultant
Keywords:
Knowledge management system, Using, Reusing and sharing knowledge, Professional characteristicsAbstract
This article identifies professional characteristics that could explain differences between auditors, lawyers and consultants' behaviors in the knowledge transfer process that is in "feeding" the KMS (voluntary sharing acts) and in using knowledge repositories. Eight independent variables have emerged from a comparison between the three main professions of the Big Four firm and their influences were to be assessed in the research model: team work coordination, travel frequency, short or long term mission, business unit size within the company, work methodology existence, trade regulations existence, alternatives in KMS using, dedicated software existence. A multi-profession, multihierarchical rank qualitative methodology (partially based on cognitive mapping) is adopted. The major results are that using acts are mostly influenced by professional characteristics, whereas "feeding" does not appear to be determined by the same factors.How to Cite
MONNIER-SENICOURT, L. (2008). L’influence des caractéristiques professionnelles sur la consultation d’un SGC et la capitalisation : le cas des métiers d’auditeur, d’avocat et de consultant. Systèmes d’Information Et Management (French Journal of Management Information Systems), 13(1), 31–61. Retrieved from https://revuesim.org/index.php/sim/article/view/215
Issue
Section
Empirical research
License
The author bears the responsibility for checking whether material submitted is subject to copyright or ownership rights (e.g. figures, tables, photographs, illustrations, trade literature and data). The author will need to obtain permission to reproduce any such items, and include these permissions with their final submission.
It is our policy to ask all contributors to transfer for free the copyright in their contribution to the journal owner. There are two broad reasons for this:
- ownership of copyright by the journal owner facilitates international protection against infringement of copyright, libel or plagiarism;
- it also ensures that requests by third parties to reprint or reproduce a contribution, or part of it, in either print or electronic form, are handled efficiently in accordance with our general policy which encourages dissemination of knowledge within the framework of copyright.
In conformity with the French law, the author keeps the 'moral rights' related to the article:
- The 'authorship right': It is the author's right to have his name associated with each publication and exploitation of the article.
- The 'integrity right': It can be claimed by the author if he finds that during an exploitation, his work has been distorted (cutting, reassembly...).